Uttarakhand High Court

ARBAP/30/2021 of M/S CHUNAWALA CONSTRUCTIONS Vs MANOHAR LAL JUYAL on 31 December 2021

COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL SRI JUSTICE S.K. MISHRA, A.C.J. ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 30 OF 2021 31ST DECEMBER, 2021 BETWEEN: M/s Chunawala Constructions & another …..Petitioners. And Manohar Lal Juyal & others ….Respondents. Counsel for the Petitioners : Mr. Devrat

IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND

AT NAINITAL

SRI JUSTICE S.K. MISHRA, A.C.J.

ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 30 OF 2021

31[ST] DECEMBER, 2021

BETWEEN:

M/s Chunawala Constructions & another And

…..Petitioners.

Manohar Lal Juyal & others

….Respondents.

Counsel for the Petitioners : Mr. Devrat Singh, learned counsel.

Counsel for the Respondents

: Mr. Piyush Garg, learned counsel.

Upon hearing the learned Counsel, the Court made the following JUDGMENT: (per SRI S.K. MISHRA, A.C.J.)

Mr. Devrat Singh, the learned counsel for the petitioner, wishes to withdraw the present arbitration petition.

2. Therefore, the arbitration petition is, hereby, dismissed as withdrawn.

3. It is also made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merit of any claim/counter-claim of the parties.

4. Withdrawal Application (IA No.01 of 2021) stands disposed of.

(S.K. MISHRA, A.C.J.)

Dated: 31[st] December, 2021NISHANT

Page 1 of 1

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead