Madras High Court
CRL OP(MD)/17407/2011 of DEVARAJ Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE on 28 December 2011
BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Twenty Eighth day of December Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice S. RAJESWARAN CRL OP(MD) No.17407 of 2011 1 DEVARAJ 2 ULAGANAN 3 KRISHNAN 4 SIVA 5 S. BALU @ PALCHAMY 6 P. POTHIRAJ 7 KRISHNAN @ RAMAKRISHNAN 8
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Wednesday, the Twenty Eighth day of December Two Thousand ElevenPRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr.Justice S. RAJESWARAN
CRL OP(MD) No.17407 of 2011
1 DEVARAJ
2 ULAGANAN
3 KRISHNAN
4 SIVA
5 S. BALU @ PALCHAMY
6 P. POTHIRAJ
7 KRISHNAN @ RAMAKRISHNAN 8 PANDI
9 PARANTHAMAN ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NOS.1 TO 9
Vs
STATE TRHOUGHTHE INSPECTOR OF POLICE SINDHUPATTY POLICE STATION, IN CRIME NO. 149/2011, MADURAI DISTRICT ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT
For Petitioner : M/S. M.RAJMOHAN AdvocateFor Respondent : Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side)
PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.
ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners are arrayed as A1 to A9 and they prayed forgrant of anticipatory bail under section 438 Cr.P.C., for thealleged offences punishable under Sections 147, 323, 341 and 506(ii) I.P.C. in Crime No.149 of 2011 on the file of therespondent police and hence, seek anticipatory bail.2.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitionersand the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for theState.
3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners wouldsubmit in his argument that the petitioners are innocent personsand they have not committed any offence. He would further submitin his argument that the petitioners have been falselyimplicated in this case and hence, he prays for anticipatoryhttps://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/bail in favour of the petitioners.
4.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor (Criminal side)would submit in his argument that the injured has already beendischarged from the hospital.
5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, Icould see that the injured has already been discharged from thehospital, this court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail tothe petitioners. Accordingly, the petitioners are directed to bereleased on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearancebefore the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Usilampatti andeach of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupeesten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to thesatisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I,Usilampatti and on further condition that the petitioners shallappear before the concerned Magistrate daily at 10.30 a.m for aperiod of four weeks. The petitioners shall comply with thecondition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously. 6.The petitioners shall appear before the Magistrateconcerned within a period of 15 days, failing which, theanticipatory bail granted shall stand automatically cancelled.
28/12/2011
/ TRUE COPY /
Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
TO
1.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.I USILAMPATTI
2.DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE MADURAI DISTRICT
3.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI
4.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE SINDHUPATTY POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT
+1. CC to M/S. M.RAJMOHAN Advocate SR.No.46186rl/6c – 29.12.2011
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
IN
CRL OP(MD) No.17407 of 2011
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
Date :28/12/2011