Uttarakhand High Court
CLCON/85/2017 of Ved Prakash Gupta Vs Sweety Aggarwal on 31 December 2020
85 of 2017 Hon’ble Sharad Kumar Sharma, J. (Via Video Conferencing) Mr. Akram Parvez, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Sandeep Kothari, Advocate for the applicant. Learned appearing counsel Mr. Akram Parvez makes a statement that the judgment dated 03.05.2016, which contained a direction to
Conclusion
CLCON No. 85 of 2017
Hon’ble Sharad Kumar Sharma, J.
(Via Video Conferencing)
Mr. Akram Parvez, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Sandeep Kothari, Advocate for the applicant.
Learned appearing counsel Mr. Akram Parvez makes a statement that the judgment dated 03.05.2016, which contained a direction to respondent no. 2 to decide the representation of the petitioner/applicant, has been complied with, as the respondent has already decided his representation on 30.04.2017.
Accordingly, he submits that the contempt petition may be dismissed, as having rendered infructuous. The same is, accordingly, dismissed as having rendered infructuous.
The same is, accordingly, dismissed as
Notice issued to the respondent is hereby discharged.
Pooja
(Sharad Kumar Sharma, J.)
31.12.2020
Page 1 of 1
Loading citations and judicial treatment…