Uttarakhand High Court
WPSS/184/2000 of MAMTA JAIN Vs STATE OF UTTARANCHAL on 14 December 2000
Petition No. 184 of 2000(S/S) Hon’ble P.C. Verma, J. Notices have been accepted by learned Chief Standing Counsel. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Transfer is an exigency of service and malafide has been show by the learned counsel for the petitioners, therefore no interference
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Conclusion
Hon’ble P.C. Verma, J.
Notices have been accepted by learned Chief Standing Counsel.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.
Transfer is an exigency of service and malafide has been show by the learned counsel for the petitioners, therefore no interference is called for. The writ petition is liable to be dismissed.
The writ petition is dismissed. However, it is provided that if the petitioners have moved representations, the same shall be considered and disposed of within one month from the date of production of a certified copy of this order.
Dt. 14.12.2000
P.C. Verma, J.