CRL OP(MD)/17309/2011 of VARKEESH Vs INSPECTOR OF POLICE on 28 December 2011

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT( Criminal Jurisdiction )

Wednesday, the Twenty Eighth day of December Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT

The Hon`ble Mr. Justice S. RAJESWARAN

CRL OP(MD) No.17309 of 2011

1 VARKEESH

2 LAKSHMI

3 SUJIN @ AJIN ...PETITIONERS / ACCUSED

Vs

STATE THROUGHTHE INSPECTOR OF POLICE THIRUVETTAAR POLICE STATION, CR.NO.965/2011, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT

For Petitioner : M/S. V.MARI SELVARAJ Advocate For Respondent : MR.C.RAMESH, Additional Public Prosecutor (Crl. Side)

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners are arrayed as accused and they prayed for grant ofanticipatory bail under section 438 Cr.P.C., for the alleged offencespunishable under Sections 447, 427, 294(B) and 506(i) I.P.C. in CrimeNo.965 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seekanticipatory bail.

2.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and thelearned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State.

3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit inhis argument that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have notcommitted any offence. He would further submit in his argument that thepetitioners have been falsely implicated in this case and hence, he praysfor anticipatory bail in favour of the petitioners.

4.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor (Criminal side) wouldsubmit in his argument that no one sustained injury in the allegedoccurrence.

5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I could seethat no one sustained injury in the alleged occurrence, this court isinclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, thepetitioners are directed to be released on bail in the event of arrest orhttps://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate,Padmanabhapuram, Kanyakumari District and each of them executing a bondfor a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the l learned JudicialMagistrate, Padmanabhapuram, Kanyakumari District and on furthercondition that the petitioners shall appear before the concernedMagistrate daily at 10.30 a.m for a period of four weeks. The petitionersshall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C.scrupulously.

6.The petitioners shall appear before the Magistrate concerned withina period of 15 days, failing which, the anticipatory bail granted shallstand automatically cancelled.

sd/-

28/12/2011

/ TRUE COPY /

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.)

Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,

Madurai - 625 023.

TO

1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE,PADMANABHAPURAM, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT.PADMANABHAPURAM, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT.

2. THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATEKANYAKUMARI AT NAGERCOIL.KANYAKUMARI AT NAGERCOIL.

3. INSPECTOR OF POLICE

THIRUVETTAAR POLICE STATION, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT.KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT.

4. THE PUBLIC PROSECUTORMADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S. V.MARI SELVARAJ Advocate SR. No.46094