CRL OP(MD)/17270/2011 of RANJITHKUMAR Vs INSPECTOR OF POLICE on 28 December 2011

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT( Criminal Jurisdiction )Wednesday, the Twenty Eighth day of December Two Thousand ElevenPRESENT

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice S. RAJESWARAN

CRL OP(MD) No.17270 of 2011

1 RANJITHKUMAR

2 BALU @ BALASUBRAMANIAN ... PETITIONER(S) / ACCUSED 2 AND 3

Vs

STATE REP BY:: THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE KEERANUR POLICE STATION, CR.NO.353/2011, PUDUKOTTAI DIST ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT

For Petitioner : M/S.N.RAVISHANKAR VALLATHARASU Advocate For Respondent : MR. C. RAMESH, ADDL. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondentpolice for the alleged offences under Sections 323, 324, 307 IPC readwith 3 and 4 of TNPPDL Act in Crime No.353 of 2011 on the file of therespondent police and seek anticipatory bail.

2. Heard Mr.N.Ravishankar Vallatharasu, learned counsel for thepetitioners and Mr.C.Ramesh, learned Additional Public Prosecutorappearing for the respondent State.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit in hisargument that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in thiscase. He would further submit that the injured has been dischargedfrom the hospital and no prejudice would be caused to the prosecutionin the event of the petitioners release on anticipatory bail.

4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit in hisargument that the injured has been discharged from the hospital.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and alsoconsidering the fact that the injured has been discharged from theconsidering the fact that the injured has been discharged from the hospital, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to thepetitioners with certain conditions.

6. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released onbail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learnedDistrict Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Keeranur, and on executing aseparate bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) withtwo sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learnedMagistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitionersshall appear before the Court concerned every day at 10.30 a.m. untilfurther orders. The petitioners shall comply with the conditionstipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

7. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistratewithin a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy madeready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail standsdismissed.

sd/-

28/12/2011

/ TRUE COPY /

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.)

TO

1 THE DIST MUNSIF CUM JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, KEERANUR, PUDUKKOTTAI DISTRICT

2 DO THRO' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, PURUKKOTTAI

3 THE ADDL. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT MADURAI

4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KEERANUR POLICE STATION, PUDUKOTTAI DIST