Rhett Precedent

Uttarakhand High Court

BA2/117/2009 of YATINDRA CHAUSHARY Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND on 31 December 2009

Hon’ble Dharam Veer, J. Mr. R.P. Nautiyal, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. M.A. Khan, Brief Holder for the State. First bail application was rejected on merit by this Court vide order dated 11.6.2009.. No fresh ground or argument has been raised by learned Counsel for the accused

BA2 No. 117/2009Hon’ble Dharam Veer, J.

Mr. R.P. Nautiyal, Advocate for the applicant.

Mr. M.A. Khan, Brief Holder for the State.

First bail application was rejected on merit by this Court vide order dated 11.6.2009..

No fresh ground or argument has been raised by learned Counsel for the accused applicant. Hence, second bail application is also rejected.

Prabodh

(D.V., J.) 31.12.2009

Page 1 of 1

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead