Madras High Court
CRL OP(MD)/23614/2013 of KANAGA LAKSHMI Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE on 30 December 2013
BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Thirtieth day of December Two Thousand Thirteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice P.N.PRAKASH CRL OP(MD) No.23614 of 2013 N.KANAGA LAKSHMI ... PETITIONER/SOLE ACCUSED Vs STATE THROUGH THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE TENKASI POLICE STATION,
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Monday, the Thirtieth day of December Two Thousand ThirteenPRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr Justice P.N.PRAKASH
CRL OP(MD) No.23614 of 2013
N.KANAGA LAKSHMI
... PETITIONER/SOLE ACCUSED
Vs
STATE THROUGH
THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE TENKASI POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICTCRIME NO. 734 OF 2013) ... RESPONDENT/ COMPLAINANT
For Petitioner : M/S.A.D.GANESHAMOORTHI AdvocateFor Respondent : M/S.A.P.BALASUBRAMANIAN, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side)
PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.
ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner is the sole accused and apprehending arrest atthe hands of the respondent police for the alleged commission ofoffences punishable under sections 294(b) and 506(i) IPC, in CrimeNo.734 of 2013 on the file of the respondent police, seeksanticipatory bail.
2. The case of the prosecution is that the occurrence wastaken place on 22.12.2013 due to wordy quarrel between thepetitioner and the defacto complainant and on the same day, a casewas registered and no one sustained injury in the allegedoccurrence.
3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submitthat the complaint itself is false and concocted and the petitionerhas nothing to do with the alleged commission of offence.
4. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner andthe learned Government Advocate(Crl. Side) appearing for the stateand also perused the entire materials available on record. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this isa fit case for granting anticipatory bail to the petitioner.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in theevent of arrest or on her appearance before the learned JudicialMagistrate, Tenkasi, Tirunelveli District and on executing a bondfor a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with twosureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learnedMagistrate concerned. The petitioner shall comply with thecondition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.
6. The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistratewithin a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copymade ready failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail standsdismissed.
sd/-
30/12/2013
/ TRUE COPY /
Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,
TO
1.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE TENKASI TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT
2.DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT3.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI4.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE TENKASI POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT +1. CC to M/S.A.D.GANESHAMOORTHI Advocate SR.No.64466RL/6C – 2/1/2014
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
IN
CRL OP(MD) No.23614 of 2013
Date :30/12/2013