Madras High Court
CRL OP(MD)/24081/2016 of PALANI Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE on 29 December 2016
BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Twenty Ninth day of December Two Thousand Sixteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice R.MAHADEVAN CRL OP(MD) No.24081 of 2016 PALANI ... PETITIONER / ACCUSED NO.1 Vs THE STATE REP BY ITS THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE R.S.MANGALAM POLICE
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Thursday, the Twenty Ninth day of December Two Thousand SixteenPRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr Justice R.MAHADEVAN
CRL OP(MD) No.24081 of 2016
PALANI
... PETITIONER / ACCUSED NO.1
Vs
THE STATE REP BY ITSTHE INSPECTOR OF POLICE R.S.MANGALAM POLICE STATION,RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT.
[CRIME NO. 213/2016] ... RESPONDENT/ COMPLAINANT
For Petitioner : M/S.S.VIJAYAKUMAR AdvocateFor Respondent : M/S.P.KANDASAMY,Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side)
PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.
ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who is arrayed as accused No.1, in CrimeNo.213 of 2016 on the file of the respondent police, apprehendsarrest at the hands of the respondent police for the allegedoffences punishable under Sections 294(b), 323, 324 and 506(ii) ofIPC and hence, seeks anticipatory bail.
2.The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner attackedthe defacto complaint and caused injuries.
3.The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that thepetitioner is an innocent person and he has been falsely implicatedin this case.
4.The learned Government Advocate(Crl. Side) appearing for therespondent on instructions submitted that the injured person hadalready been discharged from the hospital.
5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and alsoconsidering the fact that the injured person had already beendischarged from the hospital, this Court is inclined to grantanticipatory bail to the petitioner, with certain conditions.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in theevent of arrest or on his appearance before the learned JudicialMagistrate, Thiruvadanai and on executing a bond for a sum ofRs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for ahttps://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concernedand on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., until further orders. Thepetitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.
6.The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistratewithin a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copymade ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail standsdismissed.
sd/- 29/12/2016
/ TRUE COPY /
Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
TO
1.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE THIRUVADANAI
2.DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT
3.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI
4.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE R.S.MANGALAM POLICE STATION, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT.
+1. CC to M/S.M.S.JEYA KARTHIK Advocate SR.No.83816
RL/6C/2P/PV/SARI/30.12.2016
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
IN
CRL OP(MD) No.24081 of 2016
Date :29/12/2016