Madras High Court

CRL OP(MD)/23508/2013 of R.HEIZ DAWSON Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE on 30 December 2013

Cites 0, Cited by 0

BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Thirtieth day of December Two Thousand Thirteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice P.N.PRAKASH CRL OP(MD) No.23508 of 2013 1 R.HEIZ DAWSON 2 DR.R.PETER PERINBARAJA 3 A.ARULGNANAM 4 J.VIJAYA XAVIER PARTHIPAN ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT( Criminal Jurisdiction )

Monday, the Thirtieth day of December Two Thousand Thirteen PRESENT

The Hon`ble Mr Justice P.N.PRAKASH

CRL OP(MD) No.23508 of 2013

1 R.HEIZ DAWSON

2 DR.R.PETER PERINBARAJA

3 A.ARULGNANAM

4 J.VIJAYA XAVIER PARTHIPAN ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NOS.1 TO 4

Vs

STATE REP BYTHE INSPECTOR OF POLICE PALAYAM KOTTAI POLICE STATION,TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT.

(CRIME NO.1125 OF 2013) ... RESPONDENT/ COMPLAINANT

For Petitioner : M/S.T.ANTONY ARUL RAJ AdvocateFor Respondent : M/S.A.P.BALASUBRAMANIAN, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side)

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners/Accused 1 to 4 apprehending arrest at the handsof the respondent police for the alleged commission of offencespunishable under sections 147, 294(b), 448, 342, 323 & 506(ii) ofIPC in Crime No.1125 of 2013 on the file of the respondent policeseek anticipatory bail.

2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners.

3.The learned Government Advocate (criminal side) would submitthat this is a case of no injury.

4.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and alsoconsidering the fact that no injury has been caused by thepetitioners, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners onanticipatory bail.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

5.Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released onbail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before thelearned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Tirunelveli, and on each of themexecuting a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only)with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of thelearned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that thepetitioners shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.30a.m for a period of two weeks and thereafter as and when required.The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated underSection 438 Cr.P.C., scrupulously.

6.The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistratewithin a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copymade ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail standsdismissed.

sd/-

30/12/2013

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO

1.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.I TIRUNELVELI2.DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT3.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI4.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE PALAYAM KOTTAI POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT.

+1. CC to M/S.T.ANTONY ARUL RAJ Advocate SR.No.64417RL/6C – 2/1/2014

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

IN

CRL OP(MD) No.23508 of 2013

Date :30/12/2013

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead