Madras High Court
CRL OP(MD)/23508/2013 of R.HEIZ DAWSON Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE on 30 December 2013
BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Thirtieth day of December Two Thousand Thirteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice P.N.PRAKASH CRL OP(MD) No.23508 of 2013 1 R.HEIZ DAWSON 2 DR.R.PETER PERINBARAJA 3 A.ARULGNANAM 4 J.VIJAYA XAVIER PARTHIPAN ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Monday, the Thirtieth day of December Two Thousand Thirteen PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr Justice P.N.PRAKASH
CRL OP(MD) No.23508 of 2013
1 R.HEIZ DAWSON
2 DR.R.PETER PERINBARAJA
3 A.ARULGNANAM
4 J.VIJAYA XAVIER PARTHIPAN ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NOS.1 TO 4
Vs
STATE REP BYTHE INSPECTOR OF POLICE PALAYAM KOTTAI POLICE STATION,TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT.
(CRIME NO.1125 OF 2013) ... RESPONDENT/ COMPLAINANT
For Petitioner : M/S.T.ANTONY ARUL RAJ AdvocateFor Respondent : M/S.A.P.BALASUBRAMANIAN, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side)
PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.
ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners/Accused 1 to 4 apprehending arrest at the handsof the respondent police for the alleged commission of offencespunishable under sections 147, 294(b), 448, 342, 323 & 506(ii) ofIPC in Crime No.1125 of 2013 on the file of the respondent policeseek anticipatory bail.
2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners.
3.The learned Government Advocate (criminal side) would submitthat this is a case of no injury.
4.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and alsoconsidering the fact that no injury has been caused by thepetitioners, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners onanticipatory bail.
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
5.Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released onbail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before thelearned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Tirunelveli, and on each of themexecuting a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only)with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of thelearned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that thepetitioners shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.30a.m for a period of two weeks and thereafter as and when required.The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated underSection 438 Cr.P.C., scrupulously.
6.The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistratewithin a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copymade ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail standsdismissed.
sd/-
30/12/2013
Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
TO
1.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.I TIRUNELVELI2.DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT3.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI4.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE PALAYAM KOTTAI POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT.
+1. CC to M/S.T.ANTONY ARUL RAJ Advocate SR.No.64417RL/6C – 2/1/2014
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
IN
CRL OP(MD) No.23508 of 2013
Date :30/12/2013