Madras High Court

CRL OP(MD)/23476/2013 of M.PONNAR Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE on 30 December 2013

Cites 0, Cited by 0

BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Thirtieth day of December Two Thousand Thirteen PRESENT THE HON`BLE MR JUSTICE P.N.PRAKASH CRL OP(MD) No.23476 of 2013 1 M.PONNAR 2 M.SUYALLAI 3 M.KENNADY 4 P.THOMAIYAR ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED RANK NOT KNOWN Vs THE STATE REP.BY

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT( Criminal Jurisdiction )

Monday, the Thirtieth day of December Two Thousand ThirteenPRESENT

THE HON`BLE MR JUSTICE P.N.PRAKASH

CRL OP(MD) No.23476 of 2013

1 M.PONNAR

2 M.SUYALLAI

3 M.KENNADY

4 P.THOMAIYAR ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED RANK NOT KNOWN

Vs

THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE TALUK POLICE STATION, DINDGUL,DINDIGUL DISTRICT.

CR. NO.667/2013. ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT

FOR PETITIONER : M/S.D.SELVARAJ ADVOCATEFOR RESPONDENT : MR.A.P.BALASUBRAMANIAN GOVT. ADVOCATE ( CRL. SIDE)

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL UNDER SEC. 438 CR.P.C.

ORDER : THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING ORDER :- The petitioners/Accused apprehending arrest at the hands of therespondent police for the alleged commission of offences punishable undersections 294(b), 447, 323 & 506(ii) of IPC in Crime No.667 of 2013 on thefile of the respondent police seek anticipatory bail.

2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners.

3.The learned Government Advocate (criminal side) would submit thatthis is a case of no injury.

4.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and alsoconsidering the fact that no injury has been caused by the petitioners,this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on anticipatory bail.

5.Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released onbail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before thelearned Judicial Magistrate No.1, Dindigul, and on each of themhttps://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) withtwo sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shallappear before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m for a period oftwo weeks and thereafter as and when required. The petitioners shallcomply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C.,scrupulously.

6.The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate withina period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready,failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.

sd/-

30/12/2013

/ TRUE COPY /

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.)

Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,

Madurai - 625 023.

TO

1.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.I, DINDIGUL.

2.THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, DINDIGUL.

3.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, TALUK POLICE STATION, DINDGUL DISTRICT.

4.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI

+1. CC to M/S.D.SELVARAJ Advocate SR.No.63494.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

IN

CRL OP(MD) No.23476 of 2013

Date :30/12/2013

2P/6CRPB 02.01.2014

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead