Madras High Court
CRL OP(MD)/23476/2013 of M.PONNAR Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE on 30 December 2013
BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Thirtieth day of December Two Thousand Thirteen PRESENT THE HON`BLE MR JUSTICE P.N.PRAKASH CRL OP(MD) No.23476 of 2013 1 M.PONNAR 2 M.SUYALLAI 3 M.KENNADY 4 P.THOMAIYAR ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED RANK NOT KNOWN Vs THE STATE REP.BY
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Monday, the Thirtieth day of December Two Thousand ThirteenPRESENT
THE HON`BLE MR JUSTICE P.N.PRAKASH
CRL OP(MD) No.23476 of 2013
1 M.PONNAR
2 M.SUYALLAI
3 M.KENNADY
4 P.THOMAIYAR ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED RANK NOT KNOWN
Vs
THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE TALUK POLICE STATION, DINDGUL,DINDIGUL DISTRICT.
CR. NO.667/2013. ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT
FOR PETITIONER : M/S.D.SELVARAJ ADVOCATEFOR RESPONDENT : MR.A.P.BALASUBRAMANIAN GOVT. ADVOCATE ( CRL. SIDE)
PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL UNDER SEC. 438 CR.P.C.
ORDER : THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING ORDER :- The petitioners/Accused apprehending arrest at the hands of therespondent police for the alleged commission of offences punishable undersections 294(b), 447, 323 & 506(ii) of IPC in Crime No.667 of 2013 on thefile of the respondent police seek anticipatory bail.
2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners.
3.The learned Government Advocate (criminal side) would submit thatthis is a case of no injury.
4.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and alsoconsidering the fact that no injury has been caused by the petitioners,this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on anticipatory bail.
5.Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released onbail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before thelearned Judicial Magistrate No.1, Dindigul, and on each of themhttps://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) withtwo sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shallappear before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m for a period oftwo weeks and thereafter as and when required. The petitioners shallcomply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C.,scrupulously.
6.The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate withina period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready,failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.
sd/-
30/12/2013
/ TRUE COPY /
Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.)
Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,
Madurai - 625 023.
TO
1.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.I, DINDIGUL.
2.THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, DINDIGUL.
3.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, TALUK POLICE STATION, DINDGUL DISTRICT.
4.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI
+1. CC to M/S.D.SELVARAJ Advocate SR.No.63494.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
IN
CRL OP(MD) No.23476 of 2013
Date :30/12/2013
2P/6CRPB 02.01.2014