CRL OP(MD)/23560/2013 of MURUGAN Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE on 30 December 2013

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT( Criminal Jurisdiction )

Monday, the Thirtieth day of December Two Thousand Thirteen PRESENT

The Hon`ble Mr Justice P.N.PRAKASH

CRL OP(MD) No.23560 of 2013

MURUGAN ... PETITIONER/SOLE ACCUSED

Vs

STATE REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE CHOKKAMPATTI POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DIST. CR. NO. 187/2013. ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT

For Petitioner : M/S.P.T.THIRAVIAM AdvocateFor Respondent : MR.A.P.BALASUBRAMANIAN Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side)

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner the sole accused and apprehending arrest at the handsof the respondent police for the alleged commission of offencespunishable under sections 294(b), 323 and 506(i) IPC, in Crime No.187 of2013 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the alleged occurrence wastaken place on 19.12.2013 and a case was registered on 20.12.2013 and inthe alleged occurrence, the petitioner attacked the defacto complainantand caused injuries.

3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit thatthe complaint itself is false and concocted and the petitioner hasnothing to do with the alleged commission of offence.

4. Learned Government Advocate (crl. side) would submit that thedefacto complainant suffered simple injuries and was discharged from thehospital.

5. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and thelearned Government Advocate(Crl. Side) appearing for the state and alsoperused the entire materials available on record.

6.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this is afit case for granting anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly,the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrestor on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Tenkasi andon executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only)with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learnedhttps://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shallreport before the respondent police daily at 11.00 a.m. for a period oftwo weeks and thereafter, as and when required, for interrogation. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

7.The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistratewithin a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy madeready failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.

sd/- 30/12/2013

/ TRUE COPY /

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.)

Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,

Madurai - 625 023.

TO

1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TENKASI

2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE TIRUNELVELI

3 THE ADDL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE CHOKKAMPATTI POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DT.

+1. CC to M/S.P.T.THIRAVIAM Advocate SR.No.149

AA/03.01.2014/ 2p- 6c/