Gujarat High Court
SCA/7674/1998 of SHREYAS EDUCATION TRUST Vs STATE OF GUJARAT on 24 November 1998
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 7674 of 1998 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE K.R.VYAS ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 7674 of 1998
For Approval and Signature:
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE K.R.VYAS
============================================================
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgements?
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not?
3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgement?
4. Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder?
5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge?
1 to 5 No.
-------------------------------------------------------------- SHREYAS EDUCATION TRUSTVersus STATE OF GUJARAT -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR VH DESAI for Petitioner MR HC PATEL OF M/SPATEL ADVOCATES for the respondents. -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE K.R.VYAS Date of decision: 24/11/98ORAL JUDGEMENT Rule. Mr. H.C.Patel for M/s Patel Associates, Government Solicitors , waives service of the Rule on behalf of the Respondents. At the request of the learned Advocates, this petition is taken up for final hearing to-day. Having heard the learned Advocates appearing for the parties, it appears that the order dated 8-5-98 at Annexure "B" was passed against the petitioner without affording any opportunity of being heard to the petitioner-Trust and that is the main grievance of the petitioner-Trust. Mr. H.C.Patel, leanred Government Solicitor appearing for the respondents states that the 4th respondent viz Joint Director of Education (Primary) will pass appropriate order afresh in accordance with law after hearing the petitioner.
In view of the above, this petition is partly allowed. The order dated 8-5-98 at Annexure "B" is quashed and set aside. The petitioner-trust shall file reply and furnish the requirement of law before Joint Director of Education (Primary) within a week from to-day. On such details being furnished, the 4th respondent will fix the hearing by callig the petitioner and/or its representative to remain present within fifteen days thereafter and will pass appropriate order afresh in accordance with law after hearing the petitioner.Rule is made absolute to the aforesaid extent with no order as to costs.
*******
Verified copy