Gujarat High Court
SCA/2489/1995 of PRESIDENT & PRINCIPAL-NEW PROGRESSIVE EDU TRUST Vs GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT on 18 November 1995
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2489 OF 1995. Coram: R.R.Jain, J. ------------------- November 18, 1995. Order: The matter was called out in the morning. However, none remained present. Again the matter was called out at about 3.30 P.M. But, learned advocate for the petitioner is not present. The short
Coram: R.R.Jain, J.
-------------------
November 18, 1995.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order:
The matter was called out in the morning. However, none remained present. Again the matter was called out at about 3.30 P.M. But, learned advocate for the petitioner is not present.
The short controversy raised in this petition is with regard to the date of appointment of respondent No.3. According to respondent No.3, her date of appointment is 1.7.1974 whereas the petitioner alleges to be 1.6.1982. The question involved appreciation of facts and the learned Tribunal has resolved this controversy by appreciating the material and factual aspect placed before it. In my view, this involves the question of appreciation of facts and the same cannot be looked into by this court while dealing with a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Except this, I do not find any contention qua excess exercise of jurisdiction or non exercise of jurisdiction vested in the Tribunal. Hence the petition is rejected.
18.11.1995.����(R.R.Jain, J.)