Madras High Court

CRL OP(MD)/16108/2020 of Krishnan Vs The Inspector of Police on 31 December 2020

No.16108 of 2020 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 31/12/2020 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.ILANGOVAN CRL OP(MD). No.16108 of 2020 Krishnan ... Petitioner/A3 Vs The Inspector of Police, Kamuthi Police Station, Ramanathapuram District Crime

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )

Date : 31/12/2020

PRESENT

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.ILANGOVAN

CRL OP(MD). No.16108 of 2020

Krishnan ... Petitioner/A3

Vs

The Inspector of Police,Kamuthi Police Station, Ramanathapuram District Crime No.21/2016. ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : M/s.Bharathi.S, Advocate.

For Respondent : Mr.Seenivasan,

Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C

PRAYER :-

For Anticipatory Bail in Crime no.20 of 2016 on the file of therespondent police.

ORDER : The Court made the following order :- Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and thelearned Government Advocate(Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent.

2. The petitioner apprehending arrest at the hands of therespondent police for the offences punishable under sections 467,468, 471 and 420 of I.P.C. r/w. 120(b) of I.P.C., in Crime No.21 of2016 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

3. A reading of the FIR shows that one Periyasamy as Power ofAttorney had sold some portion of the property to one Narandranayakand Narandranayak appears to have executed Power of Attorney infavour of the petitioner, who in turn sold some portion of theproperty to one Krishnan. According to the defacto complainant,Narandranayak is fictitious person and the son of the petitioner isthe rcel impostor.

Page 1 of 2

4. According to the petitioner, this matter is only civil innature and only based on the Power of Attorney, subsequent saleswere effected.https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

5.Since serious allegations have been made against thepetitioner, the custodial interrogation of the petitioner only berequired to bring out the entire truth. Hence, this Court is notinclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. ThisCriminal Original Petition is dismissed.

sd/-

31/12/2020

/ TRUE COPY /

/ /2021

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.)

Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,

Madurai - 625 023.

Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic,a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but,ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correctcopy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigantconcerned.

TO

1.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KAMUTHI POLICE STATION, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT.

2.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,

MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

ORDER

IN

CRL OP(MD) No.16108 of 2020

Date :31/12/2020

IAS/RMK

PK/KV/SAR-IV/06.01.2021 : 2P/3C

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead