Madras High Court

CRL OP(MD)/23544/2013 of THIRUMALAICHAMY Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE on 30 December 2013

Cites 0, Cited by 0

BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Thirtieth day of December Two Thousand Thirteen PRESENT THE HON`BLE MR JUSTICE P.N.PRAKASH CRL OP(MD) No.23544 of 2013 THIRUMALAICHAMY ... PETITIONER /SOLE ACCUSED Vs THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ACHANPUDUR POLICE

Monday, the Thirtieth day of December Two Thousand ThirteenPRESENT

THE HON`BLE MR JUSTICE P.N.PRAKASH

CRL OP(MD) No.23544 of 2013

THIRUMALAICHAMY ... PETITIONER /SOLE ACCUSED

Vs

THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ACHANPUDUR POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT.CRIME NO.182/2013 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT

FOR PETITIONER : M/S.M.SARAVANAN ADVOCATEFOR RESPONDENT : MR.A.P.BALASUBRAMANIAN, GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL UNDER SEC. 438 CR.P.C.

ORDER : THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING ORDER :- The petitioner/sole accused apprehending arrest at the hands of therespondent police for the alleged commission offences punishable undersections 294(b), 324 and 506(ii) of IPC in Crime No.182 of 2013 on thefile of the respondent police seeks anticipatory bail.

2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner.

3.The learned Government Advocate (criminal side) would submit thatinjured has been discharged from the hospital.

4.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and alsoconsidering the fact that injured has been discharged from the hospital,this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail.

5.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail inthe event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned JudicialMagistrate, Senkottai and on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to thesatisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further conditionhttps://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m for a period of two weeks and thereafter as and when required.The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section438 Cr.P.C., scrupulously.

6.The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready,failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.

sd/-

30/12/2013

/ TRUE COPY /

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.)

Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,

Madurai - 625 023.

TO

1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE,SHENCOTTAI.

2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TIRUNELVELI.

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE

ACHANPUDUR POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT.

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,

MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI

+1. CC to M/S.M.SARAVANAN Advocate SR.No.64425.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

IN

CRL OP(MD) No.23544 of 2013

Date :30/12/2013

2P/6CRPB 30.12.2013

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead