Madras High Court
CRL OP(MD)/23463/2013 of RAMESH Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE on 30 December 2013
BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Thirtieth day of December Two Thousand Thirteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice P.N.PRAKASH CRL OP(MD) No.23463 of 2013 RAMESH ... PETITIONER / SOLE ACCUSED Vs THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE WORAIYUR POLICE STATION,
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Monday, the Thirtieth day of December Two Thousand ThirteenPRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr Justice P.N.PRAKASH
CRL OP(MD) No.23463 of 2013
RAMESH
... PETITIONER / SOLE ACCUSED
Vs
THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE WORAIYUR POLICE STATION,TRICHY DISTRICT.CRIME NO.981/2013. ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT
FOR PETITIONER : M/S.T.SENTHIL KUMAR ADVOCATEFOR RESPONDENT : MR.C.RAMESH ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
PETITION FOR BAIL UNDER SEC. 439 CR.P.C.
ORDER : THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING ORDER :- The petitioner, who was arrested by the respondent police on06.11.2013 for the alleged offence under Sections 294(b) and 307 IPC inCrime No.981 of 2013 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.
2.The case of the prosecution is that one Mahendran lodged acomplaint that the accused assaulted Lawrence with Aruvalmanai and causedinjury on his left shoulder and when it was questioned by him, theaccused assaulted him with Aruvalmanai and caused injury on his head.
3.The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the victimswere discharged from the hospital and investigation was completed.
4.Learned Government Advocate[Crl side] has strongly objected togrant bail to the petitioner.
5.I have carefully considered that rival contentions put forward byeither side and also perused the materials available on record.
6.Considering all these facts and also considering the fact, I aminclined to grant the relief of bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, thepetitioner is directed to be released on bail on his executing a bond fora sum of Rs.10,000/-[Rupees ten thousand only] with two sureties each fora like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.IV,Trichy and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear beforethe respondent Police daily at 11.00 a.m. until further orders.
sd/-
30/12/2013
/ TRUE COPY /
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.)
TO
1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.IV, TRICHY.
2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TRICHY.
3 THE SUPERINTENDENT, CENTRAL PRISON, TRICHY.
4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE WORAIYUR POLICE STATION, TRICHY DISTRICT.
5 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI
+1. CC to M/S.T.SENTHIL KUMAR Advocate SR.No.64369.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
IN
CRL OP(MD) No.23463 of 2013
Date :30/12/2013
2P/7CRPB 30.12.2013