Madras High Court
CRL OP(MD)/23873/2016 of A.MURUGAN Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, on 29 December 2016
BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Twenty Ninth day of December Two Thousand Sixteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice R.MAHADEVAN CRL OP(MD) No.23873 of 2016 A.MURUGAN ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED RANK NOT KNOWN Vs STATE REP.BY , THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CHINNAMANUR
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Thursday, the Twenty Ninth day of December Two Thousand SixteenPRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr Justice R.MAHADEVAN
CRL OP(MD) No.23873 of 2016
A.MURUGAN ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED RANK NOT KNOWN
Vs
STATE REP.BY , THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CHINNAMANUR POLICE STATION,THENI DISTRICT.
CRIME NO.NOT KNOWN OF 2016 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT
For Petitioner : M/S.C.JEGANATHAN Advocate For Respondent : MR.P.KANDASAMY, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side)
PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.
ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of therespondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections294(b), 341, 427 and 506(ii) of I.P.C in Crime No.Not Known of 2016on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.
2.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner andthe learned Government Advocate(Crl. Side) appearing for therespondent/State.
3.The learned Government Advocate(Crl. Side) on instructionswould submit that no F.I.R is registered and no F.I.R is pendingagainst the petitioner, but the petition enquiry alone is pendingand alleged threat of arrest is not true, at this stage.
4. However, the learned counsel appearing for the petitionersubmitted that the police is harassing the petitioner duringenquiry.
5. In view of the same, this Criminal Original Petition ishttps://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/disposed of with an observation that the respondent police shouldnot harass the petitioner during the enquiry. The respondent police is directed to either register a case or close the enquiry, asexpeditiously as possible. The petitioner is directed toco-operate with the enquiry. sd/- 29/12/2016 / TRUE COPY /
Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.)
Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,
Madurai - 625 023.
TO
1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,CHINNAMANUR POLICE STATION,THENI DISTRICT.
2 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECTUOR,
MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.
+1. CC to M/S.C.JEGANATHAN Advocate SR.No.83713
PMU/JIKR
RL/PV/SAR-II/30.12.2016 :2P/4C
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
IN
CRL OP(MD) No.23873 of 2016
Date :29/12/2016