Madras High Court
CRL OP(MD)/23609/2013 of SELVARAJ Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE on 30 December 2013
BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Thirtieth day of December Two Thousand Thirteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice P.N.PRAKASH CRL OP(MD) No.23609 of 2013 1 SELVARAJ 2 PRABHA ..PETITIONERS/ACCUSED (RANK NOT KNOWN) Vs. STTE REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE DISTRICT
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
( Criminal Jurisdiction )Monday, the Thirtieth day of December Two Thousand ThirteenPRESENTThe Hon`ble Mr Justice P.N.PRAKASHCRL OP(MD) No.23609 of 2013
1 SELVARAJ
2 PRABHA
..PETITIONERS/ACCUSED(RANK NOT KNOWN)
Vs.
STTE REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, THENI.(CRIME NO. NOT KNOWN/2013)..RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT
For Petitioner : M/S.P.SENGUTTUARASAN Advocate For Respondent : Mr.A.P.BALASUBRAMANI, Government Advocate (Crl.Side)
PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.
ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-The petitioners, who are arrayed as accused, pray for the grant ofanticipatory bail under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. for the alleged commissionof offences punishable under Sections 406 and 420 I.P.C., in Crime No.NotKnown of 2013, on the file of the respondent police.
2. In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel appearingfor the petitioners, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn in respect ofthe first petitioner.
3. In respect of the second respondent/wife of the first petitioner,there are no overtacts alleged against her and she is a housewife.4. Heard the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) on the abovesubmissions.
5. Taking into consideration of the facts and circumstances, thisCourt is of the view that the second petitioner can be granted the reliefof anticipatory bail and accordingly;(a) In the event of arrest by or on appearance before the respondentpolice; (b) In the event of appearance before the learned JudicialMagistrate, Uthamapalayam, within 15 days from the date of receipt ofcopy of the order,
(i) the second petitioner shall be enlarged on bail on executing abond for Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only), with two sureties eachfor the like sum to their satisfaction;
(ii) the second petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make anyinducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the fact ofthe case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court orto any Police Officer;
(iii) The second petitioner shall be available before the respondentPolice for interrogation as and when required.
sd/-
30/12/2013
/ TRUE COPY /
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.)
TO
1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, UTHAMAPALAYAM, THENI DISTRICT.
2 -DO-THRO;THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THENI.
3 THE ADDL.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT,MADURAI.
4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, THENI.
+1. CC to M/S.P.SENGUTTUARASAN Advocate SR.No.4
ORDER IN
CRL OP(MD) No.23609 of 2013
Date :30/12/2013
PBK 02/01/2014 2P/6C