Madras High Court
CRL OP(MD)/23650/2013 of KAMARAJ Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE on 30 December 2013
BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Thirtieth day of December Two Thousand Thirteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice P.N.PRAKASH CRL OP(MD) No.23650 of 2013 1 KAMARAJ 2 SANJEEVI @ SATHISKUMAR ..PETITIONERS/ACCUSED 2 & 4 Vs. STATE REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Monday, the Thirtieth day of December Two Thousand ThirteenPRESENTThe Hon`ble Mr Justice P.N.PRAKASHCRL OP(MD) No.23650 of 2013
1 KAMARAJ
2 SANJEEVI @ SATHISKUMAR ..PETITIONERS/ACCUSED 2 & 4
Vs.
STATE REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ANDIPATTI POLICE STATION, THENI DISTRICT.CR.NO. 550/2013..RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT
For Petitioner : M/S.P.SENGUTTUARASAN Advocate For Respondent : Mr.A.P.BALASUBRAMANI, Government Advocate (Crl.Side)
PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C.
ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who were remanded to the judicial custody by therespondent police on 01.12.2013 for the alleged offence under Section 304(B) of IPC in Crime No.550 of 2013, seek bail.2. It is the case of the prosecution that the petitioners and otheraccused demanded more dowry and harassed the deceased and due to whichshe committed suicide by hanging.
3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit thatthe petitioners have not committed any offence as alleged by theprosecution.
4. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that the accusedcommitted cruelty against the deceased and caused dowry death of thedeceased.
5. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and thelearned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the State andalso perused the materials available on record.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case this Court isinclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail on the following conditions.Accordingly, the petitioners are directed to be released on bail on eachof them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousandonly) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of thelearned Judicial Magistrate, Aundipatti, and on further condition thatthe petitioners shall appear before the respondent police daily at10.00 a.m until further orders.
sd/-
30/12/2013
Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.)
Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Madurai - 625 023.
TO
1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, AUNDIPATTI, THENI DISTRICT.
2 -DO-THRO'THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THENI.
3 THE ADDL.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT,MADURAI.
4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ANDIPATTI POLICE STATION, THENI DISTRICT.
5 THE SUPERINTENDENT, CENTRAL PRISON, MADURAI.
+1. CC to M/S.P.SENGUTTUARASAN Advocate SR.No.64470 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.23650 of 2013 Date :30/12/2013PBK 31/12/2013 2P/7C