Madras High Court

CRL OP(MD)/23461/2013 of RAMAKRISHNAN Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE on 30 December 2013

Cites 0, Cited by 0

BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Thirtieth day of December Two Thousand Thirteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice P.N.PRAKASH CRL OP(MD) No.23461 of 2013 RAMAKRISHNAN ... PETITIONER / ACCUSED NO.1 Vs THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE KOLLIDAM POLICE

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT( Criminal Jurisdiction )

Monday, the Thirtieth day of December Two Thousand Thirteen PRESENT

The Hon`ble Mr Justice P.N.PRAKASH

CRL OP(MD) No.23461 of 2013

RAMAKRISHNAN ... PETITIONER / ACCUSED NO.1

Vs

THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE KOLLIDAM POLICE STATION, TRICHY DISTRICT.

CRIME NO. 266/2013. ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT

For Petitioner : M/S.T.SENTHIL KUMAR Advocate For Respondent : MR.C.RAMESH, ADDL.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C.

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who was arrested by the respondent police on2/11/2013 for the alleged offence under Sections 147, 148, 294 (b)and 302 IPC in Crime No.266 of 2013 on the file of the respondentpolice, seeks bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that due to wordy quarrel,the petitioner along with other accused assaulted the defactocomplainant. At that time, the deceased intervened in order tosafeguard the defacto complainant. When the second and thirdaccused caught hold of the deceased, the petitioner stabed thedeceased with knife and caused death.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that co-accused were released on bail and anticipatory bail.

4. Learned Government Advocate(Crl. Side) has strongly objectedto grant bail to the petitioner.

5. I have carefully considered the rival contentions putforward by either side and also perused the materials available onhttps://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/record.

6. Considering all these facts and also considering the factthat the petitioner is undergoing incarceration right from 1/11/2013and also considering the fact that the other co-accused were grantedbail and anticipatory bail, I am inclined to grant the relief ofbail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed tobe released on bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum tothe satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.IV, Trichy,and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before therespondent Police daily at 11.00 a.m., until further orders.

sd/-

30/12/2013

/ TRUE COPY /

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.)

Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO

1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.IV, TRICHY.

2 -DO-THRO' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TRICHY.

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KOLLIDAM POLICE STATION, TRICHY DT.

4 THE ADDL. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,

MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

5 THE SUPERINTENDENT,CENTRAL PRISON, TRICHY.

+1. CC to M/S.T.SENTHIL KUMAR Advocate SR.No.64368.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

IN

CRL OP(MD) No.23461 of 2013

Date :30/12/2013

msm 31.12.2013 p2/7c

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead