Madras High Court
CRL OP(MD)/23680/2013 of KANNAN Vs THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE on 30 December 2013
BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Thirtieth day of December Two Thousand Thirteen PRESENT THE HON`BLE MR JUSTICE P.N.PRAKASH CRL OP(MD) No.23680 of 2013 1 KANNAN 2 ESWARI ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED 7 & 8 Vs THE STATE REP.BY THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMEN
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Monday, the Thirtieth day of December Two Thousand ThirteenPRESENT
THE HON`BLE MR JUSTICE P.N.PRAKASH
CRL OP(MD) No.23680 of 2013
1 KANNAN
2 ESWARI ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED 7 & 8
Vs
THE STATE REP.BY THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION,BODINAYAKANUR, THENI DISTRICT.
CRIME NO.11 OF 2013 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT
For Petitioner : M/S.T.VADIVELAN AdvocateFor Respondent : MR.A.P.BALASUBRAMANIAN, GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE
PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.
ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners/Accused Nos.7 and 8 apprehending arrest at the handsof the respondent police for the alleged commission of offencespunishable under sections 406 and 498-A of IPC and Section 4 of TamilNadu Prohibition of Women Harassment Act and Section 4 of DowryProhibition Act, in Crime No.11 of 2013 on the file of the respondentpolice seek anticipatory bail.
2.The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that thepetitioners are relatives of the husband of the de-facto complainant andthey are no way connected with the alleged occurrence. He would furthersubmit that the de-facto complainant got married the first accused on10.10.2009.
3.The learned Government Advocate (criminal side) would submit thatin this case the other co-accused have already been granted anticipatorybail.
4.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also thefact that the other co-accused have already been granted anticipatorybail, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on anticipatorybail
5.Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail inthe event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned JudicialMagistrate, Bodinayakkanur, and on each of them executing a bond for asum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each fora like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and onfurther condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondenthttps://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/police daily at 10.30 a.m. for a period of two weeks and thereafter asand when required. The petitioners shall comply with the conditionstipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C., scrupulously.
6.The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate withina period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready,failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.
sd/- 30/12/2013 / TRUE COPY /
Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
TO
1.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, BODINAYAKKANUR.
2.THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THENI.
3.THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, BODINAYAKANUR, THENI. THENI.
4.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI
+1. CC to M/S.T.VADIVELAN Advocate SR.No.64465.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
IN
CRL OP(MD) No.23680 of 2013
Date :30/12/2013
2P/6CRPB 02.01.2014