Madras High Court
CRL OP(MD)/23846/2016 of MUTHUPANDI Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE on 29 December 2016
BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Twenty Ninth day of December Two Thousand Sixteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice R.MAHADEVAN CRL OP(MD) No.23846 of 2016 1 MUTHUPANDI 2 SARANYA 3 RAMADOSS 4 VIJAYA ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NOS.1 TO 4 Vs STATE REP.BY , THE
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Thursday, the Twenty Ninth day of December Two Thousand SixteenPRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr Justice R.MAHADEVANCRL OP(MD) No.23846 of 2016
1 MUTHUPANDI 2 SARANYA 3 RAMADOSS 4 VIJAYA ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NOS.1 TO 4
Vs
STATE REP.BY , THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALANGANALLUR POLICE STATION, VADIPATTI TALUK,MADURAI DISTRICT
CRIME NO.530 OF 2016 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT
For Petitioner : M/S.C.BETHANASAMY Advocate For Respondent : MR.P.KANDASAMY, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side)
PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.
ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who are arrayed as accused Nos.1to 4, inCrime No.530 of 2016 on the file of the respondent police, apprehendarrest at the hands of the respondent police for the allegedoffences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 447, 294(b) 323, 324and 506(ii) of IPC and hence, seek anticipatory bail.
2. The case of the prosecution is that the accused abused thede-facto complainant with filthy languages and attacked him by handsand Aruval and also given serious life threat to him.
3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and thelearned Government Advocate(Crl. Side) for the respondent/State.
4.The learned Government Advocate(Crl. Side) appearing for therespondent on instructions submitted that the injured has beendischarged from the hospital.
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and alsoconsidering the fact that the injured has been discharged from the hospital, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to thepetitioners, with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitionersare ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or ontheir appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Vadipatti,Madurai District, and on their executing a bond for a sum ofRs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for alike sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned andon further condition that the petitioners shall appear before therespondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., for a period of four weeksand thereafter as and when required for interrogation. Thepetitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.
6.The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistratewithin a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copymade ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail standsdismissed.
sd/-
29/12/2016
/ TRUE COPY /
Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.)
Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,
Madurai - 625 023.
TO
1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE,VADIPATTI, MADURAI DISTRICT.
2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MADURAI DISTRICT.
3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE
ALANGANALLUR POLICE STATION, VADIPATTI TALUK,MADURAI DISTRICT
4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECTUOR,
MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.
+1. CC to M/S.C.BETHANASAMY Advocate SR.No.83743
PMU/JIKR
RL/PV/SAR-II/30.12.2016 :2P/6C
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
IN
CRL OP(MD) No.23846 of 2016
Date :29/12/2016