Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRM-M/64759/2018 of KAMALJEET KAUR AND ANOTHER Vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS on 31 December 2018
THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-64759-2018 Date of decision: 31.12.2018 Kamaljeet Kaur and another ...Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN Present:- Mr. Vivek Baghla, Advocate for the
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
CRM-M-64759-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB ANDHARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
CRM-M-64759-2018Date of decision: 31.12.2018
Kamaljeet Kaur and another
..Petitioners
3!1'0'
State of Punjab and others
...Respondents
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN
Present:-Mr. Vivek Baghla, Advocatefor the petitioners.|
Mr. Abhay Pal Singh Gill, AAG, Punjab.
ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN, J.(Oral)
The petitioners have approached this Court seeking protectionof their life and liberty on the premise that petitioner No. 1 has performedmarriage with petitioner No. 2 against the wishes of her parents and otherfamily members and the petitioners are apprehending threat to their life andliberty at their instance.
On the request made by the Registry that the original case filehas inadvertently been misplaced, the duplicate paperbook is treated as thefirst copy. The Registry is directed to tag the original paperbook as andwhen the same 1s traced out.
Notice of motion.
On asking of the Court, Mr. Abhay Pal Singh Gill, AAG,Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the respondent-State.
Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that airepresentation dated 27.12.2018 (Annexure P-5) was made to the SeniorSuperintendent of Police, Fazilka seeking necessary protection but no action has been taken so far in the matter.
Heard.
Without examining the question of validity or otherwise ofmarriage of the petitioners, the present petition stands disposed of with adirection to the Senior Superintendent of Police, Fazilka to look into thegrievance of the petitioners expressed in the representation (Annexure P-5)and take appropriate action, if any, warranted in the circumstances.
The Senior Superintendent of Police, Fazilka is further directedto arrange a meeting of respondent No. 4 with petitioner No.1 in case anysuch application is moved.
It is made clear that in case any FIR is registered againstpetitioner No. 2, it will be open for the police authorities to take action, inaccordance with law.
December 31, 2018
(ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN)JUDGE