Madras High Court

CRL OP(MD)/23579/2013 of NAGENDRAN Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE on 30 December 2013

BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Thirtieth day of December Two Thousand Thirteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice P.N.PRAKASH CRL OP(MD) No.23579 of 2013 NAGENDRAN ... PETITIONER / ACCUSED Vs THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE PUDUKOTTAI TOWN POLICE

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT( Criminal Jurisdiction )

Monday, the Thirtieth day of December Two Thousand ThirteenPRESENTThe Hon`ble Mr Justice P.N.PRAKASHCRL OP(MD) No.23579 of 2013

NAGENDRAN

... PETITIONER / ACCUSED

Vs

THE STATE REP.BYTHE INSPECTOR OF POLICE PUDUKOTTAI TOWN POLICE STATION, PUDUKOPTTAI DT. CR. NO. 380/2013. ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT

For Petitioner : M/S.P.GANAPATHI SUBRAMANIAN AdvocateFor Respondent : MR.C.RAMESH, Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C.

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who was arrested by the respondent police on 5/11/2013for the alleged offence under Section 302 IPC altrered into Sections 341and 302 IPC in Crime No.380 of 2013 on the file of the respondent police,seeks bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that one Santhi, W/o. Ram, lodged acomplaint with the respondent/complainant that the petitioner/accusedassaulted the deceased Kalidoss, son of the defacto complainant on2/11/2013 due to previous enmity and he was succumbed to the injuries.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondenthad completed the investigation and filed the final report before thelearned Judicial Magistrate, Pudukottai and the learned JudicialMagistrate has taken the same in P.R.C.No.29 of 2013 on 20/12/2013.

4. Learned Government Advocate(Crl. Side) has strongly objected togrant bail to the petitioner.

5. I have carefully considered the rival contentions put forward byeither side and also perused the materials available on record.https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Page 1 of 2

6. Considering all these facts and also considering the fact, I aminclined to grant the relief of bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, thepetitioner is directed to be released on bail on his executing a bond fora sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties eachfor a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate,Pudukottai and on further condition that the petitioner shall appearbefore the Committal Court daily at 11.00 a.m., until further orders.

sd/-

30/12/2013

/ TRUE COPY /

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.)

Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO

1.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE,PUDUKOTTAI.

2.DO THRO THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, PUDUKOTTAI.

3.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

4.THE OFFICER INCHARGE

DISTRICT PRISON, PUDUKKOTTAI.

5.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE

PUDUKOTTAI TOWN POLICE STATION, PUDUKOPTTAI DISTRICT.

+1. CC to M/S.P.GANAPATHI SUBRAMANIAN Advocate SR.No.64398

ORDER

IN

CRL OP(MD) No.23579 of 2013

Date :30/12/2013

rg.30.12.2013 2p/7c.

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead