Madras High Court
CRL OP(MD)/23668/2016 of K.M. ABDULLA Vs THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE on 29 December 2016
BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Twenty Ninth day of December Two Thousand Sixteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice R.MAHADEVAN CRL OP(MD) No.23668 of 2016 1 K.M.ABDULLA 2 M.RAFEEK ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NOS.1 AND 2 Vs STATE REP BY THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Thursday, the Twenty Ninth day of December Two Thousand SixteenPRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr.Justice R.MAHADEVAN
CRL OP(MD) No.23668 of 2016
1 K.M.ABDULLA
2 M.RAFEEK ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NOS.1 AND 2
Vs
STATE REP BY
THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE KODAIKANAL POLICE STATION,DINDIGUL DISTRICT, (CRIME NO.518 OF 2016) ... RESPONDENT/ COMPLAINANT
For Petitioner : M/S.M.MURALI Advocate
For Respondent : M/S.P.KANDASAMY,Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side)
PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.
ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who are arrayed as accused Nos.1 & 2, inCrime No.518 of 2016 on the file of the respondent police, apprehendarrest at the hands of the respondent police for the allegedoffences punishable under Sections 294(b), 323, 324 and 506 (ii) ofI.P.C and hence, seek anticipatory bail.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and thelearned Government Advocate(Crl. Side) for the respondent/State.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that thepetitioners are innocent and they have been falsely implicated inthe case.
4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) on instructionssubmitted that it is a case in counter case and the investigation ispending.
5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, thisCourt is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners,with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered tohttps://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearancebefore the learned District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Kodaikanal and on each of them executing a bond for a sum ofRs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for alike sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned andon further condition that the petitioners shall appear before therespondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., for a period of four weeksand thereafter as and when required for interrogation. Thepetitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.
6.The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistratewithin a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copymade ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail standsdismissed.
sd/-
29/12/2016
/ TRUE COPY /
Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.)
Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,
Madurai - 625 023.
TO
1.THE DISTRICT MUNSIF CUM JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE KODIKANAL
2.DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE DINDIGUL DISTRICT
3.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI
4.THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE KODAIKANAL POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT, +1. CC to M/S.M.MURALI Advocate SR.No.83661
RL/6C/2P/CK/SAR2/30.12.2016
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
IN
CRL OP(MD) No.23668 of 2016
Date :29/12/2016
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/