WP(MD)/15264/2011 of HAKKEMDHEEN, Vs THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, on 28 December 2011

O R D E R

The writ petition has been filed for a mandamus directing therespondents 1 to 3 not to harass the petitioner in the name of enquiry.

2. The grievance of the petitioner is that he has often been calledto the Police Station in the name of enquiry and therefore, he should notbe harassed indefinitely.

3. Mr.M.Govindan, learned Special Government Pleader takes notice forthe respondents 1 to 3 and submitted that unless the petitioner comes forenquiry, the police will not be in a position to ascertain the truth andcircumstances of the case.

4. In such circumstances, in order to ascertain the facts andcircumstances of the case and the truth involved in it, it is necessarythat the petitioner must be willing to cooperate with the respondents forhttps://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/the purpose of enquiry. But at the same time, there should be alimitation on the duration of enquiry. The learned Special Government Pleader also gives an undertaking that the petitioner will be called forenquiry only for the limited period to be fixed by the respondents interms of time and date.

5. Recording the submission made by the learned Special GovernmentPleader, the writ petition is disposed of. Consequently, M.P.(MD)No.1 of2011 is closed. No costs.

KM/ssm

/True copy/

Sd/-Deputy Registrar[Writs]

To

Assistant Registrar

1. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, MADURAI CITY.

2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, ANNA NAGAR POLICE STATION, MADURAI-2.

3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, K.PUDUR POLICE STATION, MADURAI-7.

+1 CC TO M/S.C.M.ARUMUGAM, ADVOCATE SR.NO.46093.

W.P.(MD)No.15264 of 2011

Dated:28.12.2011

2P/5CRPB : 18.01.2012