Gujarat High Court
SCA/5248/2001 of NANDUJI PRAHLADJI THAKOR Vs COMMISSIONER OF POLICE on 24 December 2001
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 5248 of 2001 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE R.P.DHOLAKIA ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 5248 of 2001
For Approval and Signature:
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE R.P.DHOLAKIA
============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements?
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- NANDUJI PRAHLADJI THAKORVersus COMMISSIONER OF POLICE -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance:
1. Special Civil Application No. 5248 of 2001 MR ANIL S DAVE with MS BANNA S DUTTA for Petitioner No. 1 MR SS PATEL AGP for Respondents No. 1-3
-------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE R.P.DHOLAKIA
Date of decision: 24/12/2001
ORAL JUDGEMENT
The present petition has been filed by the petitioner who has been detained under the provisions of Gujarat Prevention of Anti-Social Activities Act, 1985
(hereinafter referred to as `the Act of 1985') by order dated 15/6/2001 passed by the Police Commissioner, Ahmedabad City.
2. It is now well settled that unless the activities of a person as bootlegger has disturbed the maintenance of public order, he cannot be detained under the Act. Reliance is placed on a decision in the case of Piyush Kantilal Mehta Vs. Commissioner of Police, Ahmedabad & Ors. reported in AIR 1989 SC 491.
Page 1 of 2
3. I have heard learned advocate for the petitioner and also perused the material on record. According to learned advocate for the petitioner, the detaining authority has passed the detention order relying upon the two cases registered against the petiioner under the Bombay Prohibition Act and also relied upon statement of witnesses recorded by the detaining authority. The learned advocate for the petitioner has further submitted that on the date of passing detention order, the petitioner was in judicial custody, and this aspect would have been considered by the detaining authority while passing the detention order. In this connection, he has drawn my attention towards the case of Amritlal and Others Vs. Union Govt. Through Secy., Ministry of Finance and Others, 2001 SCC (Cri) 147 wherein it was held at Head note as under:
"Preventive Detention--Detention order-Subjective satisfaction--Detenu already in jail-Detaining authority must be satisfied on the basis of available cogent material about likelihood of the detenu being released on bail and not merely about likelihood of his moving application for bail--In absence of such satisfaction detention order cannot be sustained--Prevention of Illicit Traffic in Narcotic drugs and Psychotropic Substances act, 1988, S.3(1)"
4. It appears that on the date of passing the detention order, the detenu was in judicial custody, hence in view of the above judgement rendered in the case of Amrutlal (Supra), the detention order is illegal and cannot be sustained and the same is required to be quashed and set aside.
5. The petition is allowed. The impugned order of detention dated 15/6/2001 passed against the detenu is hereby quashed and set aside. The detenu namely Nanduji Prahladji Thakor is ordered to be set at liberty
Conclusion
forthwith, if not required in any other case. Rule is made absolute accordingly with no order as to costs. Writ of this judgement be sent to District Jail, Rajkot instead of District Jail, Bharuch. D.S. Permitted.
�����(R.P.DHOLAKIA,J.)
Rafik
Page 2 of 2
Loading citations and judicial treatment…