Madras High Court

CRL OP(MD)/23776/2014 of SIVASANKAR Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE on 30 December 2014

BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Thirtieth day of December Two Thousand Fourteen PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN CRL OP(MD) No.23776 of 2014 1 SIVASANKAR 2 ANJALI 3 KAVITHA 4 NALLUSAMY ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED RANK NOT KNOWN Vs THE INSPECTOR OF

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT( Criminal Jurisdiction )

Tuesday, the Thirtieth day of December Two Thousand FourteenPRESENT

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVANCRL OP(MD) No.23776 of 2014

1 SIVASANKAR

2 ANJALI

3 KAVITHA 4 NALLUSAMY ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED RANK NOT KNOWN

Vs

THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, THANJAVUR, CR.NO. NOT KNOWN OF 2014 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT

For Petitioner : M/S.P.SAMUEL GUNASINGH Advocate For Respondent : M/S.S.PRABHA, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side)

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners/Accused apprehend arrest at the hands of therespondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Section 498(A)I.P.C and Section 4 of Tamil Nadu Prevention of Women Harassment Act, inunknown Crime No.of 2014 on the file of the respondent police and hence,seeks anticipatory bail.

2.It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners thatthe petitioners are innocent and they have not committed any offence andprays for anticipatory bail in favour of the petitioners.

3.It is submitted by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) thatthe petitioners have ill-treated the defacto complainant and demandeddowry from her.

4.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and alsoconsidering the fact that it is a matrimonial dispute, this Court isinclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, with certainconditions.

Page 1 of 2

5.In the result, this petition is ordered and the petitioners areordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on theirappearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate Court, ThanjavurDistrict and on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees TenThousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfactionof the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that thepetitioners shall appear before the respondent police daily twice i.e athttps://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/10.30 a.m and 5.30 p.m until further orders. The petitioners shall complywith the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

6. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistratewithin a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy madeready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail standsdismissed. sd/- 30/12/2014 / TRUE COPY /

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO

1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE,THANJAVUR.2.-DO- THRO THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE,THANJAVUR AT KUMBAKONAM.3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICEALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, THANJAVUR.4. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.+1. CC to M/S.P.SAMUEL GUNASINGH Advocate SR.No. 69207SR : 31.12.2014 : 2P/6C

ORDER

IN

CRL OP(MD) No.23776 of 2014

Date :30/12/2014

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead