Madras High Court

CRL OP(MD)/23671/2013 of MUTHUPANDI Vs THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE on 30 December 2013

BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Thirtieth day of December Two Thousand Thirteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice P.N.PRAKASH CRL OP(MD) No.23671 of 2013 MUTHUPANDI ... PETITIONER / ACCUSED No.2 Vs THE STATE THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE CHINNAKOVILANKULAM POLICE

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT( Criminal Jurisdiction )

Monday, the Thirtieth day of December Two Thousand ThirteenPRESENT

The Hon`ble Mr Justice P.N.PRAKASH

CRL OP(MD) No.23671 of 2013

MUTHUPANDI ... PETITIONER / ACCUSED No.2

Vs

THE STATE THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE CHINNAKOVILANKULAM POLICE STATION, CHINNAKOVILANKULAM, TIRUNELVELI DT.CR.NO.179/2013 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT

For Petitioner : M/S.T.INDRACHITHU Advocate For Respondent : Mr.A.P.Balasubramani Government Advocate ( Crl. Side)

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner/Accused No.2 apprehending arrest at the hands of therespondent police for the alleged commission offences punishable undersections 147, 294(b), 323, and 506(ii) of IPC in Crime No.179 of 2013 onthe file of the respondent police seeks anticipatory bail.

2.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that thepetitioner attacked the de-facto complainant only with hands.

3.The learned Government Advocate (criminal side) would submit thatinjured has been discharged from the hospital.

4.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and alsoconsidering the fact that injured has been discharged from the hospital,this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail.

5.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in theevent of arrest or on his appearance before the learned JudicialMagistrate, Sankarankovil and on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to thesatisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further conditionthat the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police daily at10.30 a.m for a period of two weeks and thereafter as and when required.The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section438 Cr.P.C., scrupulously.

Page 1 of 2

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

6.The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within aperiod of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready,failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.

sd/- 30/12/2013

/ TRUE COPY /

Sub-Assistant Registrar

TO

1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, SANKARANKOVIL.

2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT.

3 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI

4 THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE CHINNAKOVILANKULAM POLICE STATION, CHINNAKOVILANKULAM, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT.

+1. CC to M/S.T.INDRACHITHU Advocate SR.No.56

TS/02.01.2014/2P-6C

ORDER

IN

CRL OP(MD) No.23671 of 2013

Date :30/12/2013

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead