Gujarat High Court
SCA/5201/1999 of GUJARAT STATE ROAD TRANSPOR CORPORATION Vs RAJENDRA MALABHAI JADAV on 9 December 1999
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 5201 of 1999 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE M.C.PATEL Sd/- ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 5201 of 1999
For Approval and Signature:
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE M.C.PATEL Sd/-
============================================================
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO
to see the judgements?
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO
3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO
of the judgement?
4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO
of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order mJJJJJ
JJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJ
5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO
Nos. 1 to 5 No
-------------------------------------------------------------- GUJARAT STATE ROAD TRANSPOR CORPORATION
Versus
RAJENDRA MALABHAI JADAV
-------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance:
MRS VASAVDATTA BHATT for Petitioner
MR RD RAVAL for Respondent No. 1
-------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE M.C.PATEL
Date of decision: 09/12/1999
ORAL JUDGEMENT
Heard learned Advocates for the parties. Having heard the submissions of the learned Adevocates for the parties I am of the opinion that the impugned award deserves to be set aside and remanded back to the Labour Court for readjudication on merits. The learned Advocates for the parties submit that they do not press for reasons. Accordingly the impugned order is set aside and remanded back to the Labour Court for readjudication on merits. It will be open for the parties to lead evidence in detail and it will be open to the workman to challenge the legality and validity of the inquiry and lead evidence in detail. The Labour Court shall make every endeavour to dispose of the matter as expeditiously as possible. Rule made absolute accordingly. No order as to cost.
���----
m.m.bhatt