Madras High Court

WP/34080/2017 of Rajali Vs The Commissioner on 28 December 2017

Cites 0, Cited by 0

COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 28.12.2017 CORAM THE HON'BLE

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 28.12.2017

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.S.RAMESHANDTHE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN

W.P.No.34080 of 2017 andWMP.No.37825 of 2017

Rajali

.. Petitioner Vs.

1 The Commissioner, Corporation of Chennai, Rippon Buildings, Chennai-3.2. The Chairperson/Zonal Executive Engineer (Zone No.14), (The Township Vending Committee), Corporation of Chennai, Chennai-34.

Chennai-34... Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of theConstitution of India for issuance of a writ of Mandamus,directing the respondents to consider and pass orders onthe petitioner's representation dated 28.11.2017 as per theprovisions of the Street Vendors [Protection of LivelihoodRegulation]Act,2014,madeforgrantingpermission/certificate of vending and till such time not todisturb with the running of the petitioner's Bunk Shop nearIn-gateofH.C.L.No.605,MedavakkamMainRoad,Sholinganallur, Chennai-119, wherein selling tea, coffee,snacks and food items by using LPG stove.For Petitioner : Mr.L.Chandrakumar For respondents : Mr.A.Nagarajan [Order of the Court was made by M.S.RAMESH, J.]

By consent, the writ petition itself is taken up for finaldisposal. Mr.A.Nagarajan, learned Counsel accepts notice onbehalf of the respondents 1 and 2.

2. The petitioner, who is a differently abled person andrunning a Bunk Shop near In-gate of H.C.L.No.605, MedavakkamMain Road, Sholinganallur, Chennai-119, apprehends that therespondents evict him from that place. In this regard, thepetitioner has given a representation dated 28.11.2017 to therespondents. Since, the same has not been disposed of by therespondents, the petitioner has approached this Court by way offiling the present Writ Petition.

3. In an identical situation, a Division Bench of thisCourt in W.P.No.27049/2017 dated 23.10.2017 (Shahul Hameed vs.The Commissioner, Corporation of Chennai9, Rippon Buildings,Chennai-3 and another) has held as follows in paragraphs Nos.2to 6 :

''2. The petitioner claims that he is adifferently-abled person having Locomotor Disabilityof 80% and he is running a Bunk shop at Haddows Road,Opposite to Standard Chartered Bank, Nungambakkam,Chennai 600 034, and he claims that he is selling tea,coffee and food items in an hygienic manner by usingLPG stove and out of the meager income earned, he ismaintaining himself as well as his family. Thepetitioner would further state that he is entitled tothe benefits of the benevolent Central Legislation,viz., the Street Vendors [Protection of Livelihood]Act, 2014 and the Rules and Regulations framedthereunder and till the formalities contemplated underthe Act are fully complied with, the petitioner cannotbe evicted from the present place of business and thepetitioner, in this regard, has submitted arepresentation dated 04.10.2017 to the respondentsseeking for permission / licence to continue to runthe Bunk shop in the said place and apprehendingdispossession, he came forward to file the presentwrit petition.

3Mr.L.Chandrakumar, learned counsel appearingfor the petitioner on instructions, would submit thatthe petitioner is running the Bunk shop in the abovesaid address for very many years and that, he has not sub-let or part with the interest or possession of theBunk shop in question and he continues to run the sameand selling the food articles prepared in an hygienicmanner and is strictly complying with the relevantFood Safety Norms and Rules and unless and until theidentification and enumeration process is done as perthe provisions of the above said Act, the petitionermay not be disturbed from the Bunk Shop in questionand would further submit that the petitioner hadsubmitted a representation to the Town VendingCommittee/2[nd] respondent herein and hence, prays forappropriate orders.

4Per contra, Mr.A.Nagarajan, learned Standingcounsel appearing for the respondents would submitthat immediate, urgent and necessary steps havealready been taken to form the Town Vending Committeeand enumeration process is going on and it is for thepetitioner to substantiate his plea that he is runningthe Bunk shop in question for very many years withoutparting with either the possession or interest or bothin respect of the said bunk shop.

5This Court has considered the rivalsubmissions and also perused the materials placedbefore it.6Though the petitioner has prayed for alarger relief, this Court, in the light of the abovefacts and circumstances and without going in to themerits of the claim projected by the petitioner,either in his representation or in this writ petition,directs the 2[nd] respondent to consider and dispose ofthe petitioner's representation dated 04.10.2017 onmerits and in accordance with law and pass appropriateorders within a period of eight weeks from the date ofreceipt of a copy of this order and communicate thedecision taken, to the petitioner and till such time,the said official shall defer further decision withregard to the removal of the bunk shop. It is madeclear that the petitioner, till the disposal of therepresentation by the 2[nd]respondent, shall notchange/alter the physical features and the characterof the bunk shop in question and shall not create anythird party rights in respect of the bunk shop inquestion.

4. The above said facts are similar to that of the presentcase also. In view of the same, there shall be a direction tothe 2[nd] respondent herein to consider and pass appropriate orders on the petitioner's representation dated 28.11.2017 onmerits and in accordance with law within a period of eight weeksfrom the date of receipt of a copy of this order. It is madeclear that till the representation of the petitioner is disposedof by the 2[nd] respondent, the physical features and character ofthe petitioner's Bunk Shop near In-gate of H.C.L.No.605,Medavakkam Main Road, Sholinganallur, Chennai-119, shall not bedisturbed.

5. With the above observation, the writ petition isdisposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected MiscellaneousPetition is also closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS V) //True Copy// Sub Assistant RegistrartsiTo:1 The Commissioner, Corporation of Chennai, Rippon Buildings, Chennai-3.2. The Chairperson/Zonal Executive Engineer (Zone No.9), (The Township Vending Committee), Corporation of Chennai, Chennai-34.+1cc to Mr.R.Kamaraj, Advocate, S.R.No.92605

W.P.No.34080 of 2017

CS/09/01/18

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead