Madras High Court
CRL OP(MD)/24153/2016 of KANNAN, S/O.RAMANUJAM, Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, on 29 December 2016
BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Twenty Ninth day of December Two Thousand Sixteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice R.MAHADEVAN CRL OP(MD) No.24153 of 2016 1 KANNAN, 2 ARUMUGAM, 3 VELLAICHAMY, ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED NO.1 TO 3 Vs STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Thursday, the Twenty Ninth day of December Two Thousand SixteenPRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr Justice R.MAHADEVAN
CRL OP(MD) No.24153 of 2016
1 KANNAN, 2 ARUMUGAM,
3 VELLAICHAMY, ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED NO.1 TO 3
Vs
STATE REP.BYTHE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VADIPATTI POLICE STATION,MADURAI DISTRICT
CR.NO.624 OF 2016 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT
For Petitioner : M/S.M.JEGADEESH PANDIAN Advocate For Respondent : MR.P.KANDASAMY Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side)
PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.
ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who are arrayed as accused Nos.1 to 3, inCrime No.624 of 2016 on the file of the respondent police, apprehendarrest at the hands of the respondent police for the allegedoffences punishable under Sections 323, 341 and 506(ii) IPC andhence, seek anticipatory bail.
2. The case of the prosecution is that the defacto complainantowned agricultural land near Thanichiyam, Madurai District and whenhe entered in the land for the purpose of cultivation, thepetitioners restrained and threatened him with dire consequences.
3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and thelearned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) for the respondent/State.
4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) on instructionssubmitted that the injured has been discharged from the hospital.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and alsoconsidering the fact that the injured has been discharged from thehospital, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to thehttps://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/petitioners, with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitionersare ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Vadipatti,Madurai District and on each of them executing a bond for a sum ofRs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for alike sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned andon further condition that the petitioners shall appear before therespondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., for a period of four weeksand thereafter as and when required for interrogation. Thepetitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.
5.The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistratewithin a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copymade ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail standsdismissed.
sd/-
29/12/2016
/ TRUE COPY /
Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
TO
1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE,VADIPATTI
2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE MADURAI DISTRICT
3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VADIPATTI POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT.
4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.
GJM/SKS/RR/SAR-2-3.1.17-2P-5C
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
IN
CRL OP(MD) No.24153 of 2016
Date :29/12/2016