Madras High Court

WP/50049/2006 of MRS.SAGUNATHALA 60 YRS Vs THE COMMISSIONER on 22 December 2006

High Court of Judicature at Madras Dated: 22.12.2006 Coram: The

In the High Court of Judicature at Madras Dated: 22.12.2006

Coram:The Honourable Mr.Justice P.SATHASIVAMandThe Honourable Mr.Justice S.TAMILVANANWrit Petition No.50049 of 2006and M.P.No.1 of 2006

Sagunthala..vs..1. The Commissioner, Corporation of Chennai, Rippon Buildings, Chennai-600 003.2. The Zonal Officer, Zone V, Corporation of Chennai, 183, E.V.R.Periyar High Road, Kilpauk, Chennai-600 010.3. The Standing Committee, Corporation of Chennai, Chennai-600 003.

..Petitioner..vs..

..Respondents

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution ofIndia, for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing respondents 1 and2 not to take action pursuant to the 1[st] respondent order dated06.11.2006, pending the disposal of the appeal dated 08.12.2006 filedby the petitioner to the 3[rd] respondent.For Petitioner : Mr.J.Saravana VelFor Respondents : Mr.A.Mohammed Ghouse

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

ORDER

(Order of the Court was made by P.SATHASIVAM, J.,)

The petitioner has approached this Court to issue a Writ ofMandamus, directing respondents 1 and 2 not to take action pursuant tothe order of the 1[st] respondent dated 06.11.2006, pending disposal ofthe appeal dated 08.12.2006 filed by the petitioner to the 3[rd]respondent.

2. On direction, Mr.A.Mohammed Ghouse takes notice forrespondents.

Page 1 of 2

3. Considering the limited relief prayed for and in view of theassertion that petitioner has filed an appeal before the StandingCommittee of Corporation of Chennai on 08.12.2006 and the same wasduly acknowledged by the office of the Standing Committee on11.12.2006, we are of the view that ends of justice would be met bydirecting 3[rd] respondent to consider and dispose of the appeal of thepetitioner dated 08.12.2006, in accordance with law, within a periodof eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, afteraffording opportunity to the petitioner. Till such final orders /decision being taken by the Standing Committee, no demolition becarried out in the building in question.

Writ petition is disposed of on the above terms. No costs.Consequently, M.P.No.1 of 2006 is closed.

Sd/Asst.Registrar

/true copy/

gl

Sub Asst.Registrar

To

1. The Commissioner, Corporation of Chennai, Rippon Buildings, Chennai-600 003.

2. The Zonal Officer, Zone V, Corporation of Chennai, 183, E.V.R.Periyar High Road, Kilpauk, Chennai-600 010. Zone V, Corporation of Chennai, 183, E.V.R.Periyar High Road, Kilpauk, Chennai-600 010.

3. The Standing Committee, Corporation of Chennai, Chennai-600 003. Corporation of Chennai, Chennai-600 003.

+1cc to Mr.A.Mohammed Ghouse, Advocate Sr 64645+1cc to Mr.P.V.Bakthavatchalam, Advocate Sr 64607

NA (CO)km/5.1.

Writ Petition No.50049 of 2006

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead