Madras High Court

CRL OP(MD)/23927/2014 of NATARAJAN Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE on 30 December 2014

BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Thirtieth day of December Two Thousand Fourteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice R.MAHADEVAN CRL OP(MD) No.23927 of 2014 NATARAJAN ... PETITIONER/ ACCUSED RANK NOT KNOWN Vs THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE SEMPATTI POLICE

Tuesday, the Thirtieth day of December Two Thousand Fourteen PRESENTThe Hon`ble Mr Justice R.MAHADEVAN

CRL OP(MD) No.23927 of 2014

NATARAJAN ... PETITIONER/ ACCUSED RANK NOT KNOWN

Vs

THE STATE REP.BYTHE INSPECTOR OF POLICE SEMPATTI POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT. CR. NO.171/2014. ... RESPONDENT/ COMPLAINANT

For Petitioner : M/S.B.ANANDAN Advocate

For Respondent : MRS.S.PRABHA, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side)

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondentpolice for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 395 and 506(ii)I.P.C. in Crime No.171 of 2014 and hence, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner thatthe petitioner is innocent and he has not committed any offence and praysfor anticipatory bail in favour of the petitioner.

3. It is submitted by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side)that it is a case of robbery of Rs.2500/- from the defacto complainantand the accused also threatened the defacto complainant with direconsequences and the investigation is going on.

4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Courtis inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, with certainconditions. Accordingly,the petitioner is ordered to be released on bailin the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned JudicialMagistrate No.II, Dindigul and on executing a bond for a sum ofRs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a likehttps://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and onfurther condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police daily twice at 10.30 a.m. and 05.30 p.m. until further orders. Thepetitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438Cr.P.C. Scrupulously.

Page 1 of 2

5. The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy madeready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail standsdismissed.

sd/-

30/12/2014

/ TRUE COPY /

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO

1.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.II,DINDIGUL.

2.DO THRO THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, DINDIGUL.

3.THE ADDL. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,

MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

4.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE

SEMPATTI POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT.

+1. CC to M/S.B.ANANDAN Advocate SR.No.69322

ORDER

IN

CRL OP(MD) No.23927 of 2014

Date :30/12/2014

rg.31.12.2014 2p.6c.

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead