Madras High Court

CRL OP(MD)/24069/2016 of TAMILARASI Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE on 29 December 2016

Cites 0, Cited by 0

BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Twenty Ninth day of December Two Thousand Sixteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice R.MAHADEVAN CRL OP(MD) No.24069 of 2016 1 TAMILARASI 2 USHA ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED 3 & 5 Vs THE STATE OF TAMILNADU THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT( Criminal Jurisdiction )

Thursday, the Twenty Ninth day of December Two Thousand SixteenPRESENT

The Hon`ble Mr Justice R.MAHADEVAN

CRL OP(MD) No.24069 of 2016

1 TAMILARASI 2 USHA ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED 3 & 5

Vs

THE STATE OF TAMILNADUTHE INSPECTOR OF POLICE MELAVALAVU POLICE STATION,MELUR TALUK, MADURAI DISTRICT.CRIME NO. 281 OF 2016 ... RESPONDENT/ COMPLAINANT

For Petitioner : M/S.V.P.RAJAN Advocate

For Respondent : MR.P.KANDASANY Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side)

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who are arrayed as accused Nos.3 & 5, inCrime No.281 of 2016 on the file of the respondent police, apprehendarrest at the hands of the respondent police for the allegedoffences punishable under Section 306 IPC and hence, seekanticipatory bail.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and thelearned Government Advocate(Crl. Side) for the respondent/State.

3. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) on instructionssubmitted that it is a case of matrimonial dispute and theinvestigation is pending.

4.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, thisCourt is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners,with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered tobe released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearancebefore the learned Judicial Magistrate, Melur and on each of themexecuting a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousandonly) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction ofhttps://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that thepetitioners shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.30

a.m., for a period of four weeks and thereafter as and when requiredfor interrogation. The petitioners shall comply with the conditionstipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

5. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistratewithin a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copymade ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail standsdismissed.

sd/-

29/12/2016

/ TRUE COPY /

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.)

Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,

Madurai - 625 023.

TO

1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MELUR

2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE

MADURAI DISTRICT

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,MELAVALAVU POLICE STATION, MELUR TALUK, MADURAI DISTRICT. MELUR TALUK, MADURAI DISTRICT.

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,

MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT,MADURAI

+1. CC to M/S.V.P.RAJAN Advocate SR.No.83783

GJM/CK/SAR-3-30.12.16-2P-6C

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

IN

CRL OP(MD) No.24069 of 2016

Date :29/12/2016

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead