Madras High Court

CRL OP(MD)/24127/2016 of RADHAKRISHNAN Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE on 29 December 2016

BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Twenty Ninth day of December Two Thousand Sixteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice R.MAHADEVAN CRL OP(MD) No.24127 of 2016 1 RADHAKRISHNAN ... PETITIONER No.1/ACCUSED No.1 2 GEETHA RANI ... PETITIONER No.2/ACCUSED No.2 3

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT( Criminal Jurisdiction )

Thursday, the Twenty Ninth day of December Two Thousand Sixteen PRESENT

The Hon`ble Mr Justice R.MAHADEVAN

CRL OP(MD) No.24127 of 2016

1 RADHAKRISHNAN ... PETITIONER No.1/ACCUSED No.1

2 GEETHA RANI ... PETITIONER No.2/ACCUSED No.2

3 SANTHANA LAKSHMI ... PETITIONERS No.3 / ACCUSED No.3

Vs

THE STATE REPRESENTED BY

THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE KALLIKUDI POLICE STATION,THIRUMANGALAM TALUK,MADURAI DISTRICT.

(CRIME NO. 284 / 2016) ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT

For Petitioner : M/S.D.SIVARAMAN Advocate For Respondent : MR.P.KANDASAMY, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side)

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who are arrayed as accused Nos.1 to 3, inCrime No.284 of 2016 on the file of the respondent police, apprehendarrest at the hands of the respondent police for the allegedoffences punishable under Sections 420 I.P.C hence, seekanticipatory bail.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and thelearned Government Advocate(Crl. Side) for the respondent/State.

3.The case of the prosecution is that the petitioners hereinare said to have sold the property of the defacto complainant,without his knowledge.

4.According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, if thedecree in A.S.No.277 of 1995 is taken into consideration properly,https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/this entire picture is civil in nature.

Page 1 of 2

5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, thisCourt is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners,with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioners are orderedto be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearancebefore the learned Judicial Magistrate, Thirumangalam and on eachof them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Tenthousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to thesatisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on furthercondition that the first petitioner shall appear before therespondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., until further orders and thepetitioners 2 and 3 shall appear before the respondent police as andwhen required . The petitioners shall comply with the conditionstipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

6.The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistratewithin a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copymade ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail standsdismissed.

sd/-

29/12/2016

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.)

Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,

Madurai - 625 023.

TO

1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THIRUMANGALAM

2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE

MADURAI DISTRICT

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE KALLIKUDI POLICE STATION, THIRUMANGALAM TALUK, MADURAI DISTRICT.

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S.D.SIVARAMAN Advocate SR.No.83842

ORDER

IN

CRL OP(MD) No.24127 of 2016

Date :29/12/2016

SMA/CK/SAR-2/30.12.2016:2P/6C

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead