Gujarat High Court
FA/129/2000 of UNION OF INDIA Vs JASHODA WD/O THAKURDAS on 6 December 2000
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD FIRST APPEAL No 129 of 2000 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE A.R.DAVE ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
FIRST APPEAL No 129 of 2000
For Approval and Signature:
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE A.R.DAVE
============================================================
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO
to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunde JJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJ 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO 1 to 5 No -------------------------------------------------------------- UNION OF INDIAVersus JASHODA WD/O THAKURDAS -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MS PJ DAVAWALA for Petitioners NOTICE SERVED BY DS for Respondent No. 1 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE A.R.DAVE
Date of decision: 06/12/2000
ORAL JUDGEMENT
Admit. The respondent is present in person and she waives service. In pursuance of the consent given by the respondent, the appeal is finally heard today.
At the time of hearing of the appeal, Addl.
Central Government Standing Counsel Mrs. Davawala has submitted that during pendency of the appeal, the parties to the litigation have resolved their dispute amicably by entering into an agreement dated 15.11.2000 whereby the respondent landlady will be keeping possession of two rooms and two rooms shall be retained by the appellants-tenants and in consideration of occupation of the two rooms, monthly rent of Rs. 2000/- shall be paid by the appellants-tenants to the respondent as mentioned in the deed of lease of office accommodation dated 15.11.2000. A copy of the deed of lease dated 15.11.2000
the two rooms, monthly rent of Rs. 2000/- shall be paid by the appellants-tenants to the respondent as mentioned in the deed of lease of office accommodation dated 15.11.2000. A copy of the deed of lease dated 15.11.2000 entered into between the parties is placed on record.
In view of the settlement arrived at amongst the parties, the appeal is allowed. The impugned judgment and decree dated 21.2.2000 are quashed and set aside. There shall be no order as to costs.
�����(A.R. Dave, J.)
(hn)