Madras High Court

CRL OP(MD)/23457/2013 of KARUPPIAH Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE on 30 December 2013

BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Thirtieth day of December Two Thousand Thirteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice P.N.PRAKASH CRL OP(MD) No.23457 of 2013 KARUPPIAH ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.1 Vs STATE REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE DEVAKOTTAI TALUK POLICE

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT( Criminal Jurisdiction )

Monday, the Thirtieth day of December Two Thousand Thirteen PRESENT

The Hon`ble Mr Justice P.N.PRAKASH

CRL OP(MD) No.23457 of 2013

KARUPPIAH ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.1

Vs

STATE REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE DEVAKOTTAI TALUK POLICE STATION, DEVAKOTTAI, SIVAGANGAI. CR. NO. 518/2013. ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT

For Petitioner : M/S.R.AGILESH Advocate

For Respondent : MR.A.P.BALASUBRAMANIAN Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side)

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondentpolice for the alleged offence punishable under sections 294 (b), 324 and506 (ii) IPC, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that thepetitioner is innocent and he hs been falsely implicated in the case.

3. Learned Government Advocate(Crl. Side) submitted that the injuredwas discharged from the hospital.

4. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and thelearned Government Advocate(crl. Side) appearing for the State andperused the materials available on record.

Page 1 of 2

5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Courtis inclined to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in theevent of arrest or on his appearance before the learned JudicialMagistrate, Devakottai and on executing a personal bond for a sum ofRs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a likesum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and onfurther condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondentpolice as and when required for the purpose of interrogation. Thehttps://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438Cr.P.C., scrupulously.

6. The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistratewithin a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy madeready failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. sd/- 30/12/2013 / TRUE COPY /

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, DEVAKOTTAI2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE SIVAGANGAI3 THE ADDL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE DEVAKOTTAI TALUK POLICE STATION, DEVAKOTTAI, SIVAGANGAI.+1. CC to M/S.R.AGILESH Advocate SR.No.64412

AA/03.01.2014/ 2p- 6c/

ORDER

IN

CRL OP(MD) No.23457 of 2013

Date :30/12/2013

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead