Madras High Court

CRL OP(MD)/24834/2015 of SUBRAMANIAN Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE on 29 December 2015

BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Twenty Ninth day of December Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice G.CHOCKALINGAM CRL OP(MD) No.24834 of 2015 1 SUBRAMANIAN 2 RAJESH 3 PRABHU ..PETITIONERS/ACCUSED 2 TO 4 Vs. STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

( Criminal Jurisdiction )Tuesday, the Twenty Ninth day of December Two Thousand FifteenPRESENT

The Hon`ble Mr Justice G.CHOCKALINGAMCRL OP(MD) No.24834 of 2015

1 SUBRAMANIAN

2 RAJESH

3 PRABHU

Vs.

..PETITIONERS/ACCUSED 2 TO 4

STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE MURAPPANADU POLICE STATION, THOOTHUKUDI DIST.CR.NO.332/2015..RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT

For Petitioner : M/S R.PON KARTHIKEYAN Advocate For Respondent : Mr.A.P.BALASUBRAMANI, Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who are arrayed as accused Nos.2 to 4, apprehendarrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offencepunishable under Sections 294(b) and 506(ii) of I.P.C., in Crime No.332of 2015 on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail.2. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners thatthe petitioners are innocent persons and they have not committed anyoffence and pray for anticipatory bail in favour of the petitioners.3. It is submitted by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.side)that the injured has been discharged from the hospital.

Page 1 of 2

4. Considering the fact that the injured has been discharged fromthe hospital, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to thepetitioners, with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioners areordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on theirappearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Srivaikundam, and oneach of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees TenThousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfactionof the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that thepetitioner shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m.for a period of one week. The petitioners shall comply with the conditionstipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

5. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistratewithin a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy madeready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. sd/- 29/12/2015

/ TRUE COPY /https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.)

2

TO

1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, SRIVAIKUNDAM, THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT.

2 -DO-THRO'THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE,THOOTHUKUDI.

3 THE ADDL.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT,MADURAI.

4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,MURAPPANADU POLICE STATION, THOOTHUKUDI DIST.

+1. CC to M/S R.PON KARTHIKEYAN Advocate SR.No.76527

ORDER IN

CRL OP(MD) No.24834 of 2015

Date :29/12/2015

PBK/GSV-AN/SAR-II 30/12/2015 ::2P-6C::

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead