CRL OP(MD)/24847/2015 of VAIRAN Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE on 29 December 2015

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT( Criminal Jurisdiction )

Tuesday, the Twenty Ninth day of December Two Thousand FifteenPRESENT

The Hon`ble Mr Justice G.CHOCKALINGAM

CRL OP(MD) No.24847 of 2015

1 VAIRAN 2 ESWARI ... PETITIONER / ACCUSED A1 & A2

Vs

THE STATE REP.BYTHE INSPECTOR OF POLICE SINTHUPATTI POLICE STATION,MADURAI DISTRICT.IN CR.NO. 262/2015 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT

For Petitioner : M/S S.SATHISHKUMAR Advocate For Respondent : MR.P.KANNITHEVAN, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side)

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who are arrayed as accused Nos.1 & 2,apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for thealleged offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 323, 324 and 506(i) of IPC, in Crime No.262 of 2015 on the file of the respondentpolice and hence, seek anticipatory bail.

2.It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitionersthat the petitioners are innocent persons and they have notcommitted any offence and they have been falsely implicated in thiscase and pray for anticipatory bail in favour of the petitioners.

3.It is submitted by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side)that the injury is of simple in nature and the injured person hadalready been discharged from the hospital.

4.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and alsoconsidering the fact that the injury is of simple in nature and theinjured person has already been discharged from the hospital, thisCourt is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners,with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered tobe released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearancebefore the learned Judicial Magistrate, Thirumangalam and on each ofthem executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousandhttps://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction ofthe learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.00a.m., for a period of one week and thereafter, as and when requiredfor interrogation. The petitioners shall comply with the conditionstipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

5. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistratewithin a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copymade ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail standsdismissed.

sd/-

29/12/2015

/ TRUE COPY /

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO

1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE,THIRUMANGALAM.THIRUMANGALAM.

2 DO THRO'THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATEMADURAI.

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICESINTHUPATTI POLICE STATION,MADURAI DISTRICT.

4 THE ADDL. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S S.SATHISHKUMAR Advocate SR.No.76513