Madras High Court

CRL OP(MD)/17302/2011 of K.CHELLAMUTHU, Vs THE INSPECTO OF POLICE, on 28 December 2011

BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Twenty Eighth day of December Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr. Justice S. RAJESWARAN CRL OP(MD) No.17302 of 2011 1 K.CHELLAMUTU 2 P.SUBRAMANI 3 C.P.INDRAMOORTHY 4 M.CHELAMUTHU 5 V.BALAKRISHNAN 6 K.SUBRAMANI ...

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT( Criminal Jurisdiction )

Wednesday, the Twenty Eighth day of December Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT

The Hon`ble Mr. Justice S. RAJESWARAN

1 K.CHELLAMUTU

2 P.SUBRAMANI

3 C.P.INDRAMOORTHY

4 M.CHELAMUTHU

5 V.BALAKRISHNAN

6 K.SUBRAMANI... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED 6 TO 11Vs STATE REP. BY ITSTHE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, E.O.W. II, KARUR DISTRICT.(CR.NO.1/2010)... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT

For Petitioner : M/S. T.BALAKRISHNAN Advocate For Respondent : MR.C.RAMESH, Additional Public Prosecutor (Crl. Side)

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners are arrayed as A6 to A11 and they apprehend arrest atthe hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishableunder Section 5 of TNPID Act, in C.C.No.10 of 2011 on the file of thelearned Special Judge under TNPID Act, Madurai and seek anticipatory bail.

2. Heard Mr.T.Balakrishnan, the learned counsel appearing for thepetitioners and Mr.C.Ramesh, learned Additional Public Prosecutorappearing for the State.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit in hisargument that due to the non appearance of the petitioners, Non-BailableWarrant have been issued against the petitioners and the same is pendingand therefore, they have come forward this petition.

4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit in hisargument that due to the non appearance of the petitioners, Non-BailableWarrant has been issued against the petitioners and the same is stillpending.

Page 1 of 2

5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court ishttps://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. However, thepetitioners are at liberty to surrender themselves before the learnedSpecial Judge under TNPID Act, Madurai within a period of one week from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and to file an applicationfor cancellation of Non-bailable Warrant and in the event of filing saidan applications, the learned Special Judge under TNPID Act, Madurai isdirected to consider the bail applications and pass orders, on the sameday, and in accordance with law.

With the aforesaid direction, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of.

sd/-

28/12/2011

/ TRUE COPY /

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.)

Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,

Madurai - 625 023.

TO

1. THE SPECIAL JUDGE UNDER TNPID ACT,MADURAI.MADURAI.

2. THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,E.O.W. II, KARUR DISTRICT.

+1. CC to M/S. T.BALAKRISHNAN Advocate SR.No.46148

ORDER

IN

CRL OP(MD) No.17302 of 2011

Date :28/12/2011

RJ/29.12.112p/5c

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead