Madras High Court
CRL OP(MD)/17248/2011 of CYCLE KADAI MURUGAN @ Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, on 28 December 2011
BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Twenty Eighth day of December Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice S. RAJESWARAN CRL OP(MD) No.17248 of 2011 CYCLE KADAI MURUGAN @ V.RAJAPANDI ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED-3 Vs STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Wednesday, the Twenty Eighth day of December Two Thousand Eleven PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr.Justice S. RAJESWARAN
CRL OP(MD) No.17248 of 2011
CYCLE KADAI MURUGAN @ V.RAJAPANDI ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED-3
Vs
STATE REP.BYTHE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PALANI TOWN POLICE STATION,DINDIGUL DISTRICT
NO.1628 OF 2011) ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT
For Petitioner : M/S. T.LENIN KUMAR Advocate For Respondent : MR. C.RAMESH, Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.
ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner is arrayed as A3 and he prayed for grant ofanticipatory bail under section 438 Cr.P.C., for the alleged offencespunishable under Sections 147, 294(b), 323 and 506(ii) I.P.C. in CrimeNo.1628 of 2011 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seeksanticipatory bail.
2.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and thelearned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State.
3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit in hisargument that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has not committedany offence. He would further submit in his argument that the petitionerhas been falsely implicated in this case and hence, he prays foranticipatory bail in favour of the petitioner.
4.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor (Criminal side) would submitin his argument that no one sustained injury in the alleged occurrence. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
Page 1 of 2
5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I could see thatno one sustained injury in the alleged occurrence, this court is inclinedto grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioneris directed to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on hisappearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Palani, DindigulDistrict and on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees tenthousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction ofthe learned Judicial Magistrate, Palani, Dindigul District and on furthercondition that the petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistratedaily at 10.30 a.m for a period of four weeks. The petitioner shall complywith the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.
6.The petitioner shall appear before the Magistrate concernedwithin a period of 15 days, failing which, the anticipatory bail grantedshall stand automatically cancelled.
sd/-
28/12/2011
/ TRUE COPY /
Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.)
Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,
Madurai - 625 023.
TO
1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE,
PALANI, DINDIGUL
2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATEDINDIGULDINDIGUL
3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,PALANI TOWN POLICE STATION,PALANI TOWN POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT
4 THE ADDL. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.
+1. CC to M/S. T.LENIN KUMAR Advocate SR.No.46112
ORDER
IN
CRL OP(MD) No.17248 of 2011
Date :28/12/2011
TR : 29.12.2011: 2p/6c
Page 2 of 2
Loading citations and judicial treatment…