Madras High Court

CRL OP(MD)/24578/2015 of POUNRAJ Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE on 29 December 2015

BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Twenty Ninth day of December Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice G.CHOCKALINGAM CRL OP(MD) No.24578 of 2015 1 POUNRAJ 2 SATHYA MOORTHY 3 VELMURUGAN 4 VANITHA 5 SUBA 6 MARIYAMMAL 7 RAJESHWARI ... PETITIONERS /

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT( Criminal Jurisdiction )

Tuesday, the Twenty Ninth day of December Two Thousand FifteenPRESENT

The Hon`ble Mr Justice G.CHOCKALINGAM

CRL OP(MD) No.24578 of 2015

1 POUNRAJ

2 SATHYA MOORTHY

3 VELMURUGAN

4 VANITHA

5 SUBA

6 MARIYAMMAL

7 RAJESHWARI ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED NOS. 1 TO 7

Vs

THE STATE REP.BYTHE INSPECTOR OF POLICE SAMAYANALLUR POLICE STATION,SAMAYANALLUR, MADURAI DISTRICT.

(IN CRIME NO. 480 OF 2015) ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT

For Petitioner : M/S S.M.A JINNAH Advocate For Respondent : MR.A.P.BALASUBRAMANI, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side)

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who are arrayed as A-1 to A-7, apprehend arrest atthe hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishableunder Sections 147, 148, 323, 324, 506(ii) IPC and Section 4 of TamilNadu Women Harassment Act, in Crime No.480 of 2015, on the file of therespondent police hence, seek anticipatory bail.

2. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners thatthe petitioners are innocent persons and they have not committed anyoffence and a false case has been foisted against them.

3. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) submits that the injured person has already been discharged from the hospital.https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Page 1 of 2

4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also the nature of the offence, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bailto the petitioners with certain conditions.

5. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail inthe event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned JudicialMagistrate No.IV, Madurai and on each executing a bond for a sum ofRs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a likesum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and onfurther condition that the petitioners shall appear before respondentPolice daily at 10.30 a.m. for a period of one week and thereafter asand when required. The petitioners shall comply with the conditionstipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

6. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistratewithin a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy madeready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail standsdismissed.

sd/-

29/12/2015

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO

1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.IVMADURAI

2 DO THRO THE CHEIF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATEMADURAI DISTRICT

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICESAMAYANALLUR POLICE STATION,SAMAYANALLUR, MADURAI DISTRICT.

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTORMADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S S.M.A JINNAH Advocate SR.No.76471.

IN

CRL OP(MD) No.24578 of 2015

Date :29/12/2015

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/AM/30.12.2015/SKS.RR/SAR-II/2P/6C

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead