Madras High Court

CRL OP(MD)/24953/2015 of RAMASAMY, Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, on 29 December 2015

BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Twenty Ninth day of December Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice G.CHOCKALINGAM CRL OP(MD) No.24953 of 2015 1 RAMASAMY, 2 KANDASAMY, ... PETITIONER(S) / ACCUSED 2 & 3 Vs THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT( Criminal Jurisdiction )

Tuesday, the Twenty Ninth day of December Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT

The Hon`ble Mr Justice G.CHOCKALINGAM

CRL OP(MD) No.24953 of 2015

1 RAMASAMY,

2 KANDASAMY, ... PETITIONER(S) / ACCUSED 2 & 3

Vs

THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PANTHALKUDI POLICE STATION, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT.

CR.NO. 218/2015 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT

For Petitioner : M/S M.S.SARAVANAKUMAR Advocate For Respondent : Mr.A.P.Balasubramani, Government Advocate(Crl. Side)

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who are arrayed as A2 and A3, apprehend arrest at thehands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable underSections 341, 323, 294(b) and 506(i) of I.P.C., in Crime No.218 of 2015 onthe file of the respondent police hence, seek anticipatory bail.

2.It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that thepetitioners are innocent persons and they have not committed any offenceand a false case has been foisted against them.

3.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) submits that the injuredhas also been discharged from the hospital.

4.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and alsoconsidering the fact that the injured has also been discharged from thehospital, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to thepetitioners with certain conditions.

Page 1 of 2

5. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released onbail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learnedJudicial Magistrate, Aruppukkottai, Virudhunagar District and on each ofthem executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only)with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learnedMagistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shallappear before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Kovilpatti daily athttps://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/10.30 a.m until further orders. The petitioners shall comply with thecondition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

6. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate withina period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready,failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.

sd/- 29/12/2015 / TRUE COPY /

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.)

Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO

1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, ARUPPUKKOTTAI.

2 DO THRO THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, VIRUDHUNAGAR AT SRIVILLIPUTHUR.

3 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE,NO.I, KOVILPATTI.

4 DO THRO THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THOOTHUKUDI

5 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,

MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

6 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,

PANTHALKUDI POLICE STATION, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT.

+1. CC to M/S M.S.SARAVANAKUMAR Advocate SR.No. 76545.

TS/30.12.2015/2P-8C/NGM-SS/SAR - II

ORDER

IN

CRL OP(MD) No.24953 of 2015

Date :29/12/2015

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead