Madras High Court
CRL OP(MD)/17806/2017 of BALAMURUGAN Vs THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, on 28 December 2017
BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Twenty Eighth day of December Two Thousand Seventeen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice S.VAIDYANATHAN CRL OP(MD) No.17806 of 2017 1 BALAMURUGAN 2 ARUMUGAM ... PETITIONERS/ A -1 & A2 Vs STATE REP. BY THE SUB INSPECTOR OF
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Thursday, the Twenty Eighth day of December Two Thousand Seventeen PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr Justice S.VAIDYANATHAN
CRL OP(MD) No.17806 of 2017
1 BALAMURUGAN 2 ARUMUGAM ... PETITIONERS/A-1 & A2
Vs
STATE REP. BY THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, JEYAMANGALAM POLICE STATION,THENI DISTRICT.
(CR.NO.306 OF 2017) ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT
For Petitioner : Mr.A.K.MANICKAM Advocate For Respondent : Mr.K.ANBARASAN, Government Advocate (Crl.side)
PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C.
ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners/A1 & A2, who were arrested on 12.12.2017and remanded to judicial custody on 13.12.2017 for the offencespunishable under Sections 341, 324 and 307 IPC in Crime No.306 of2017 on the file of the respondent police, seek bail.
2. The case of the prosecution is that due to previousennmity, the petitioners along with other accused persons are saidto have attacked the father of the defacto complainant and causedinjury to him, which resulted in registration of the present case.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioners has submittedthat the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case andthey are ready to abide by any conditions being imposed by thisCourt.
4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) has stronglyobjected to the grant of bail, contending that the investigation ofthe case is at the initial stage and if the petitioners/accused arelet out on bail, there is every possibility of the accused tamperingthe witnesses/evidences and hampering the investigation.https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
Page 1 of 2
5. Taking into consideration the serious nature of theallegations levelled against these petitioners and the fact thatthey were taken into custody only from 13.12.2017, this Court is notinclined to grant the relief as prayed for by the petitioners.
6. In the result, this Criminal Original Petition standsdismissed accordingly.
sd/-
28/12/2017
/ TRUE COPY /
Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
TO
1 THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,JEYAMANGALAM POLICE STATION,THENI DISTRICT, 2 THE SUPERINTENDENT
CENTRAL POLICE, MADURAI
3 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI
ORDER
IN
CRL OP(MD) No.17806 of 2017
Date :28/12/2017
ar
SH/CM-VR/SAR-2:03.01.2018:2p/4c
Page 2 of 2
Loading citations and judicial treatment…