Telangana High Court
CRP/1113/2016 of B GOEL, HYDERABAD Vs SHRAVAN BADRUKA, HYDERABAD AND ANR on 31 December 2021
COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEIVBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DT. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA CIVIL REVISION PETIT ION NO: 1113 oF 2016 Petition under Article 227 ol the constitution of lndia aggrieved by the order
t
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEIVBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DT. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA
CIVIL REVISION PETIT ION NO: 1113 oF 2016
Petition under Article 227 ol the constitution of lndia aggrieved by the orderdated: 26.10.2015 in RA No.175 of 2014 in RC.No.179 of 20.10 on the file of theCourt of the Addl. Chief Judge, City Small Causes Court at Hyderabad.Court of the Addl. Chief Judge, City Small Causes Court at Hyderabad.
Between:
Bhagwandas Goel, Sio Nathanlal Goel, Aged 56 years, Occ: Business, Rl/oBegum Bazar, Hyderabad.Begum Bazar, Hyderabad.
...REVISION PETITIONER/RESPONDENT
AND
'1 . Shravan Badruka, S/o. Mukuna la lBadruka, Age 42 years, Occ: Business,. Shravan Badruka, S/o. Mukuna la lBadruka, Age 42 years, Occ: Business,
2. ShyamBadruka,, S/o. MukundlalBadruka, Aged 41 years, Occ: Business, Both residents of H.No.8-2-686/9/9 & i0, Road No.12, Banjara Hiils, Hyderabad
...RESPONDENTS/APPELLANTS
CRPMP. NO: 1408 OF 2016
Petition under section 151 cPc praying that in the circumstances stated inthe affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased suspend the orderthe affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased suspend the orderpassed in RA No.175 oI 2014 dated: 26.10.2015 passed by the Additional chiefJudge, City Small Causes Court, Hyderabad.Judge, City Small Causes Court, Hyderabad.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI DAMODAR MUNDRA
Counsel forthe Respondents: SRI R. A. ACHUTHANAND
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON'B LE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALI\THACIVIL IEVISION PETITION NO.1113 0F 2016
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Learned c< unsel for the petitioner submits that rhe matterhas been settler I between the parties and, therefore, the CivilRevision Petition may be dismissed.has been settler I between the parties and, therefore, the CivilRevision Petition may be dismissed.
Recording -he said submission, the Civil Revision petition isdismissed as infi .tctuous.dismissed as infi .tctuous.
There shr ll be no order as to costs. Miscellaneousapplications, if a ry, pending shall stand dismissed.
SD/-N.CHANDRA SEKHAR RAOASSISTANT REGISTRARASSISTANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY'
SECTION OFFICER
To,
1. The Additional Cl rief Judge, City Small Causes Court, Hyderabad.
2. One CC to Sri Di modar Mundra, Advocate [OPUC]
3. One CC to Sri R. A. Achuthanand, Advocate IOPUC]IOPUC]
4. Two CD Copies5. One Spare Copygbr^ x-45. One Spare Copygbr^ x-4
HIGH [COURT]
DATED: 311121it021
ORDER
CRP.No.1113 [(,t ]2016
DISMISSING TIIE CRPAS INFRUGTUOUSAS INFRUGTUOUS
t [5TAl ][e:] o,iIi.] ol ril [?ji? ][:]