Telangana High Court
CRP/2398/2022 of Kola Yakalaxmi Vs Vallapu Santhamma and 9 others on 30 December 2022
COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE P,MADHAVI DEVI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2398 OF 2022 Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of lndia, against the Order aggrieved /against
,,:
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE P,MADHAVI DEVI
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2398 OF 2022
Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of lndia, against the Orderaggrieved /against the Docket Order dated.2'1.06.2022 [passed ]in 1.A.573 of 2022 inOS 188 of 2022 on the file of the Court of file of the Junior Civil Judge-Cum-Judicial Magistrate of First Class, at Thorrur.
Between:
Kola Yakalaxmi, Wo. Ramulu, age. 35 years, Occ.Housewife, R/oMechra.ipally Village, Nellikudur Mandal, Mahabububad District.
...Petitioner/Plaintiff
AND
1. Vallapu Santhamma, Wo. late Vallapu Venkataiah@ Venakanna, ase.50years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o. Matedu Village, Thorrur Mandal, Mahabubabaddistrictyears, Occ. Agriculture, R/o. Matedu Village, Thorrur Mandal, Mahabubabaddistrict
2. Vallapu Srikanth, S/o. late Venkataiah,age. 25 years, Occ. Agriculture,R/o.Matedu Village, Thorrur Mandal, Mahabubabad DistrictR/o.Matedu Village, Thorrur Mandal, Mahabubabad District
3. Vallapu Rajamma, W/o. Mallaiah,age. 45 years Occ. housewife, R/o. MateduVillage,Thorrur Mandal, Mahabubabad DistrictVillage,Thorrur Mandal, Mahabubabad District
4. Gottigorla Swaroopa, Wo. Sriny,age. 45 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o. MateduVillage, Thorrur Mandal, Mahabubabad DlstrictVillage, Thorrur Mandal, Mahabubabad Dlstrict
5. Bandi Aruna, Wo. Yadagiri, age.42 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o. RayaparthyVillage, Thorrur Mandal, Mahabubabad DistrictVillage, Thorrur Mandal, Mahabubabad District
6. Kola Venkanna, S/o. Mallaiah,age. 55 years, Rio. Mechrajpally Village,Nellikudur Mandal, Mahabubabad districtNellikudur Mandal, Mahabubabad district
7. Gundeboina Mounika, R/o.Ammasom Paravathagiri Mandal, Warangal District.Wo. Mahendar, age. 25 years, Occ.house wife ,
8. Kola Revath, D/o. Venkanna, age.20 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o.Mecharajpally Village, Nellikudur Mandal, Mahabubabad DistrictMecharajpally Village, Nellikudur Mandal, Mahabubabad District
9. The Tashildar, Thorrur Mandal, Mahabubabad District.
,
10.The Government of Telanqana, through District Collector MahabubabadDistrict. ( R I and 1O are n-ot necessaiy parties to this CRp)District. ( R I and 1O are n-ot necessaiy parties to this CRp)
... Res pondents/Defendants
lA NO: 1 OF 2022
Petition under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 Read with Section 151 CpC prayingthat in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Courtmay be pleased to grant ad-interim injunction an favour of this petitioner byrestraining respondents/ defendants not to alienating the suit schedule propertytill the disposal of main suit, in the interest of Justice.
SCHEDULE PROPERTY
Item No.1
AII that in the Sy.no 164 (old) now Sy. No146/A5i.l(new) admeasuringabout Ac.3-32 gts at Bonthupally village, Thonur mandal, Mahabubbabad District.bounded by.
East . land of Vallapu Srinu
West . pathway
North. land of Vallapu Rajamma ( Def.No.3)
South. land of Vallapu Rajamma ( Def.No.3)
Item llo.2
All that in the Sy.no. 164 (otd) now Sy.No146/A4l1 (new) admeasuringabout Ac.3-32 gts at Bonthupalry vilrage,Thorrur mandal,Mahabubbabad District.bounded by.
East. land of Naini Ashok Reddy Mango garden 'y'{est . pathway l,,lorth. land of Naini Ashok Reddy Mango garden i I
J
South. land [of ][Vallapu ][Shanthamma ][( ][Def ][No ][l ][)]
Counsel for [the Petitioner: ][M/s GUNDLAPALLI V S ][S ][S SRUTHI]Counsel for the [Respondent ][No.3: M/s ][A' ][RAGHURAMA ][AURAVA]The Court made [the ][following: ][ORDER]
THE HON'BLE [SMT. JUSTICE P.MADHAVI DEVI]CIVIL[REVISIO N ][PETITI][ ON ][No][ .239E ][o][f ][2022]
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
This Civil [Revision ][Petition ][is ][filed ][seeking ][a ][direction ][to ][the]lower court [to ][consider ][and ][pass orders ][in ][I'A'No'573 ][of ][2022 ][of]O.S.No.18B [of ][2O22.,daled2l'06'2022 ][on ][the ][file ][of ][the ][Junior ][Civil]Judge-cum-Judicial [Magistrate ][of ][First ][Class ][at ][Thorrur']
2. The [petitioner ][is ][the plaintiff ][in the ][Suit ][in ][O'S'No'188 ][of ][2022]which is filed [for partition ][of ][joint ][family ][properties ][and ][separate]and [permanent ][injunction' ][Learned counsel ][for ][the]possession petitioner submitted [that ][the petitioner has Iiled ][l'A'No'573 of ][2022]for an interim [direction not ][to alienate ][the ][property ][pending disposal]of the Suit. [The grievance ][of the petitioner/ ][plaintiff ][is ][that ][instead ][of]the [interim ][direction' ][only ][an ][urgent ][notice ][has ][been]grantlng directed and [the petitioner ][apprehends ][if the ][interim ][direction ][is ][not]granted immediately, [the respondents ][may ][transfer the ][suit ][schedule]\third [parties ][may ][come ][into picture ][pending disposasl]properties and of the Suit.
3. The [notices ][sent ][to ][the ][respondent ][have been ][served ][and ][the]respondent [No.3 ][is ][also ][represented ][by ][the ][counsel ][and only with]
It
I
I
.rl
regard to one respondent i.e., respondent No.2, there15 IIendorsement that 'he has moved from the said address,.
4. However, since the prayer of the petitioner in the Civil RevisionPetition is only to direct the lower court to pass order in LA.No.573of 2022 expeditiously ald since the urgent notices have already beenissued by the lower court, this Court deems it fit and proper to passam order directing the lou,er court to consider and pass orders inI.A.No.573 of 2022 within a period of two (02) weeks from the date ofreceipt of a copy of this order.
5. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is disposed of. Thereshall be no order as to costs.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Revision petition,shal1 stard closed.
SD/. N. SRIHARIASSISTANT REGISTFAR
i/TRUE COPY//
,(/
SECTION OFFICER
To,
IThe Junior Civil J udge-Cum-J udicial Magistrate of First Class, at Thorrur.2One CC to M/s GUNDLAPALLI V S S S SRUTHI, Advocate [OPUC]aOne CC to M/s A. RAGHURAMA AURAVA, Advocate [OPUC]4Two CD CopiesMIUK
"i-
HIGH COURTPMD, JDAf ED:3011212022
ORDERCRP.No.2398 of 2022
y'L"r"4:)ToI1,I$N$8i (,,,'\:..?\;;,/
DISPOSING OF THE CIVIL REVISION [PETITION]
t4>,