Telangana High Court
WP/22352/2004 of The Superintending Engineer, Vs Sri Md. Yusuf, on 30 December 2004
COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G. BIKSHAPATHY And THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE P.S.NARAYANA WRIT PETITION NO : 22352 of 2004 Between: 1 The Superintending
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND FOUR
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G. BIKSHAPATHY
And
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE P.S.NARAYANA
WRIT PETITION NO : 22352 of 2004
Between:
1 The Superintending Engineer, (R&B) Warangal Circle, Warangal.
2 The Engineer-in-Chief, R & B Department, Errummanzil, Hyderabad.
3 Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Secretary, Department of Transport, Roads & Buildings, Secretariat, Hyderabad.
4 Government of Andhra Pradesh, Department of Finance & Planning, Rep. by its Secretary, Secretariat, Hyderabad.
5 The Executive Engineer, R & B Division, Warangal.
6 The Executive Engineer, R & B Mahabubabad, Warangal .
..... PETITIONERS
AND
1 Sri Md. Yusuf, S/o Jaffar, Works Inspector, Sub Division, Jangaon, Warangal .
2 Sri G. Ganesh, S/o Mallaiah, Work Inspector Grade IV, ROB Sub Division, Warangal .
.....RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in thecircumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased toissue any writ or proceedings more particularly one in the nature of "Writ ofCertiorari" calling for the records pertaining to the orders passed in O.A.No.9371/2002 on the file of Hon'ble A.P.A.T. Hyderabad dated 13th November, 2002and quash the same as illegal and arbitrary.
Counsel for the Petitioners: GP FOR SERVICES IICounsel for the Respondent: …….
The Court at the admission stage made the following:
ORAL ORDER: (per GB.J.)
This Court disposed of similar identical Writ Petition, as that of in this WritPetition, viz., Writ Petition No.13980 of 2004, dated 10.10.2004, directing A.P.Administrative Tribunal to dispose of the O.A. therein on merits.
2. Under these circumstances and following the ratio in the Judgment referredto above, we are not inclined to interfere with the order passed by the Tribunal.However, we direct the Tribunal to dispose of O.A.No.9371 of 2002 on its ownmerits expeditiously. No costs.
-------------------------------(G.BIKSHAPATHY, J.)30[th] December, 2004.
-------------------------------(P.S.NARAYANA, J.)SSR
..... REGISTRAR
// TRUE COPY //
To
1 The Superintending Engineer, (R&B) Warangal Circle, Warangal.
2 The Engineer-in-Chief, R & B Department, Errummanzil, Hyderabad.
3 The Secretary, Department of Transport, Roads & Buildings, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Secretariat, Hyderabad.
4 The Secretary, Department of Finance & Planning, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Secretariat, Hyderabad.
5 The Executive Engineer, R & B Division, Warangal.
6 The Executive Engineer, R & B Mahabubabad, Warangal .
7 2 CCs to G.P. for Services-II, High Court of A.P. Hyderabad. (OUT)
8 2 CD copies
9 The Registrar, A.P. Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad.