Telangana High Court
WP/29323/2009 of Smt.K.Vasundhara Vs Rajendranagar Municipality, represented by its on 31 December 2009
COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THIS THE 31st DAY OF DECEMBER, 2009 W.P.No.29323 of 2009 BETWEEN: Smt K.Vasundhara ... PETITIONER(S) and Rajendranagar Municipality rep by its Commissioner, Rajendranagar Mandal, R.R. District and others …RESPONDENT(S) THE
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESHAT HYDERABAD
THURSDAY, THIS THE 31[st] DAY OF DECEMBER, 2009
W.P.No.29323 of 2009
BETWEEN:
Smt K.Vasundhara
and
... PETITIONER(S)
Rajendranagar Municipality rep by its Commissioner, RajendranagarMandal, R.R. District and others …RESPONDENT(S)
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDYW.P.No.29323 of 2009
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Petitioner claims to have submitted a representation to the 1[st]respondent alleging that the 3[rd] respondent deviated from thesanctioned plan while making construction in premises bearing plotno.3, Manikonda, Rajendranagar Municipality, Ranga Reddy District. His grievance is that no steps have been taken thereon.
Heard the learned counsel for petitioner and the learnedStanding Counsel appearing on behalf of respondent nos.1 and 2.
This Court cannot express any opinion as to whether the 3[rd]respondent has deviated from the sanctioned plan. It is for therespondents 1 and 2 to verify and to arrive at a conclusion. Therepresentation made by the petitioner cannot be kept pendingindefinitely.
Hence, the writ petition is disposed of directing the respondentnos.1 and 2 to pass orders on the representation submitted by thepetitioner against the 3[rd] respondent, within a period of six weeks fromthe date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as tocosts.
__________________________
L.NARASIMHA REDDY, J
31[st] December 2009CVRK